<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rdf:RDF xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://revis.openscience.si/IzpisGradiva.php?id=13412"><dc:title>Aligning stakeholder governance with industry 5.0</dc:title><dc:creator>Besednjak Valič,	Tamara	(Avtor)
	</dc:creator><dc:creator>Džajić Uršič,	Erika	(Avtor)
	</dc:creator><dc:creator>Lozar,	Janja	(Avtor)
	</dc:creator><dc:subject>biogospodarstvo</dc:subject><dc:subject>Industry 5.0</dc:subject><dc:subject>stakeholder governance</dc:subject><dc:subject>rural development</dc:subject><dc:subject>circular economy</dc:subject><dc:subject>multi-level governance</dc:subject><dc:description>Integrating bioeconomy principles into the emerging Industry 5.0 agenda is presented as a way to reconcile competitiveness with sustainability, resilience, and human-centric development. This chapter examines how 
stakeholder governance in rural regions enables or constrains such transformations, with a particular focus on the roles of governance enablers and barriers in the relevance of territorial/local self-government. Conceptually, it links debates on stakeholder governance, the bioeconomy, and Industry 5.0, arguing that rural bioeconomy pathways are shaped by the interplay of institutions, networks, and cognitive frames, rather than technology or markets alone. This article examines how stakeholder governance arrangements enable or constrain rural bioeconomy transformation across three case regions (Slovenia, Montenegro, and Baden-Württemberg). Using Industry 5.0 as a normative frame and SOFIA as an analytical coding approach, it identifies key institutional, network, and cognitive
enablers and barriers, and derives governance-relevant implications for territorial development.</dc:description><dc:date>2026</dc:date><dc:date>2026-03-26 13:39:12</dc:date><dc:type>Neznano</dc:type><dc:identifier>13412</dc:identifier><dc:language>sl</dc:language></rdf:Description></rdf:RDF>
