<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rdf:RDF xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://revis.openscience.si/IzpisGradiva.php?id=14245"><dc:title>Quantifying the impact of cyberattacks on global trade networks: a network analysis approach</dc:title><dc:creator>Morić,	Zlatan	(Avtor)
	</dc:creator><dc:creator>Kopal,	Robert	(Mentor)
	</dc:creator><dc:creator>Levnajić,	Zoran	(Komentor)
	</dc:creator><dc:subject>global trade networks</dc:subject><dc:subject>cyberattack risk</dc:subject><dc:subject>network centrality</dc:subject><dc:subject>structural exposure</dc:subject><dc:subject>systemic resilience</dc:subject><dc:subject>network analysis</dc:subject><dc:subject>cybersecurity</dc:subject><dc:description>This dissertation examines the reciprocal relationship between cyberattacks and global trade networks. Directed weighted networks constructed from bilateral trade data (2010–2020) are linked to country-level cyber incident records. Logistic and negative binomial models show that structurally accessible countries face significantly higher cyberattack probabilities (OR = 5.33, p &lt; 0.001) and intensities (IRR = 5.78, p = 0.016). Difference-in-differences, event-study, and spillover analyses find no measurable change in network centrality following attacks (treatment effects &lt; 0.07 SD; spillover coefficients &lt; 0.004, p &gt; 0.38). The central finding is a structural asymmetry: harmonic in-closeness centrality predicts cyber risk, yet the network remains unchanged by the attacks it attracts. Robustness analysis across four trade datasets (Spearman ρ &gt; 0.95) confirms these conclusions are invariant to data source selection.</dc:description><dc:publisher>Z. Morić</dc:publisher><dc:date>2026</dc:date><dc:date>2026-07-14 12:21:05</dc:date><dc:type>Doktorsko delo/naloga</dc:type><dc:identifier>14245</dc:identifier><dc:language>sl</dc:language></rdf:Description></rdf:RDF>
