20.500.12556/ReVIS-11810 Constitutional pluralism and authoritarianism This article examines the relationship between constitutional pluralism and authoritarianism. It does so since the Weiss decision of the FCC spurred unusual attacks on constitutional pluralism. This particular theoretical vision of European integration has been described as inherently dangerous and its abandonment has been called for out of chiefly instrumentalist reasons, in order to prevent constitutional pluralism turning into an autocrats’ refuge. The article argues this critique of constitutional pluralism does not succeed. Due to its truncated, exclusively positivist understanding of constitutional pluralism, it has failed to take into account pluralism’s normative core. The latter presents itself an antipode to authoritarianism, which means that the autocratic regimes simply cannot credibly avail themselves of the theory of constitutional pluralism to justify their authoritarian actions. German Federal Constitutional Court constitutional pluralism principled legal pluralism primacy true false false German law journal Angleški jezik Ni določen https://www.cambridge.org/core/services/aop-cambridge-core/content/view/82351410D0BE416FB06146436D8103D2/S2071832220000565a.pdf/constitutional_pluralism_and_authoritarianism.pdf Članek v reviji 2025-06-18 12:12:30 2025-06-18 12:12:30 2025-06-19 03:07:58 0000-00-00 00:00:00 2020 0 0 Nasl. z nasl. zaslona; Opis vira dne 1. 9. 2020; str. 1023-1031 iss. 5 Vol. 21 Jul. 2020 0000-00-00 NiDoloceno NiDoloceno NiDoloceno 0000-00-00 0000-00-00 2020-07-01 342 2071-8322 26843651 10.1017/glj.2020.56 constitutional_pluralism_and_authoritarianism.pdf constitutional_pluralism_and_authoritarianism.pdf 1 73533FADA93FA387F15028899B9E31B9 5e2b053475c56caccbc9847a8069f71b6371beab23ba9cb6ae1d834e9ceef1e8 437ed98e-4c1c-11f0-bf0a-001a4af901a5 https://revis.openscience.si/Dokument.php?lang=slv&id=13649 Nova Univerza - Evropska pravna fakulteta 0 0 0