20.500.12556/ReVIS-12959 Maritainovski filozofski izvori izjave Dignitatis humanae The Maritainian philosophical origins of the declaration Dignitatis humanae Izjava 2. vatikanskega koncila Dignitatis humanae je eden izmed tistih koncilskih dokumentov, ki najbolj buri duhove glede vprašanja njegove skladnosti s predhodnim učiteljstvom Cerkve, in sicer zaradi liberalnega tona tega dokumenta. Zdi se namreč, da prepoveduje kakršno koli obliko državne prisile v razmerju do državljanov glede verskih vprašanj. Izjava je bila sprejeta zlasti pod vplivom Maritainovih pogledov na to vprašanje, ki so bili na koncilu zaradi svoje ambivalentnosti dovolj sprejemljivi tako za progresivno kot za konservativno krilo. V članku pokažem na globlje filozofske korenine Maritainovih pogledov, ki so vezane na njegovo pojmovanje spoznanja po nagibu ali po sonaravnosti. Prikažem tudi možne vire tega pojmovanja pri avtorjih, kot so Bergson, Blondel, Rousselot in Maréchal, ki so vsi močno vplivali na razvoj katoliške teologije v Franciji v 20. stoletju (zlasti t. i. nouvelle théologie). Skupna poteza vseh teh možnih virov je naklonjenost do pobud v smeri poudarka na praksi zoper teorijo, ki jih je prinesla Kantova filozofija. The Second Vatican Council’s declaration Dignitatis humanae is among the conciliar documents that have provoked the greatest debate concerning their coherence with the Church’s earlier magisterium, primarily because of the document’s liberal tone. In particular, it appears to prohibit any form of state coercion of citizens in matters of religion. Its adoption was influenced especially by the views of Jacques Maritain on this issue; the inherent ambivalence of his position rendered it acceptable at the Council to both progressive and conservative factions. In this article, I draw attention to the deeper philosophical roots of Maritain’s stance, which are closely linked to his understanding of knowledge by inclination or connaturality. I further examine the possible sources of this understanding in thinkers such as Bergson, Blondel, Rousselot, and Maréchal, all of whom significantly shaped the development of twentiethcentury Catholic theology in France, particularly the movement known as nouvelle théologie. A common feature of these intellectual sources is their openness to tendencies— ultimately traceable to Kantian philosophy—that privilege practical reason over theoretical reason. 2. vatikanski koncil Dignitatis humanae spoznanje iz nagiba spoznanje po sonaravnosti nouvelle théologie Jacques Maritain Second Vatican Council knowledge by inclination knowledge by connaturality true false true Fakulteta za pravo in ekonomijo Slovenski jezik Angleški jezik Fakulteta za pravo in ekonomijo Članek v reviji 2026-01-16 22:44:40 2026-01-19 22:28:32 2026-01-20 03:15:04 0000-00-00 00:00:00 2025 0 0 str. 31-66 št. 2 Letn. 10 2025 0000-00-00 Zaloznikova Objavljeno NiDoloceno 0000-00-00 0000-00-00 2025-12-29 272-732.2:323.3:1(44):141.7 2464-0344 264752899 10.62983/rn2865.25b.2 RAZ_Kerze_Ivo_2025.pdf RAZ_Kerze_Ivo_2025.pdf 1 6978B166FE9738C5379FE5179F954BC3 a743dd8a6d91636dfec4a6d2cdf55777307b81e8f0d927ff26abc93237021896 90e0b8ad-f324-11f0-a15d-001a4af901a5 https://revis.openscience.si/Dokument.php?lang=slv&id=15304 Fakulteta za pravo in ekonomijo 0 0 0