20.500.12556/ReVIS-13179 Primerjava meritev sagitalnih krivin hrbtenice, izmerjenih s svinčnico in aparatom za rasterstereografijo Formetric 4D, pri otrocih in mladostnikih magistrsko delo študijskega programa druge bolonjske stopnje Zdravstvene vede Uvod: Zanesljive in dostopne metode ocenjevanja telesne drže so ključne za zgodnje prepoznavanje posturalnih nepravilnosti. V klinični praksi se pogosto uporablja svinčnica, ker omogoča hitro in enostavno merjenje, medtem ko novejše metode, kot je Formetric 4D, omogočajo natančne, ponovljive meritve. Metode: Analizirani so bili podatki 35 preiskovancev. Primerjani so bili razdalje od navpičnice do procesusa spinosusa C7 (PSC7) in L3 (PSL3) ter sagitalni indeks. Podatki so bili primerjani z normativnimi vrednostmi in analizirani glede na indeks telesne mase (ITM), spol in starost. Statistična obdelava je bila izvedena v programu SPSS 29.0. Statistična značilnost je bila določena pri p = 0,05. Rezultati: Statistično značilna razlika med metodama je bila ugotovljena v nivoju PSC7 (p < 0,001; α = 0,05), medtem ko je v nivoju PSL3 ni (p = 0,252). Sagitalna indeksa dobro korelirata (ICC = 0,864). Prav tako je izračunan interval zaupanja za meritve s svinčnico znotraj intervala zaupanja normativnih vrednosti (NV), ki je enak za oba nivoja meritev (NV = 39,9 ± 16,7 mm; PSC7 = 37,68–48,03 mm in PSL3 = 32,98–41,02 mm). Razprava in sklep: Rezultati so pokazali dobro primerljivost med metodama. Statistično značilne razlike so bile le pri meritvah v cervikalnem nivoju. ITM in starost nista vplivala na meritve, razlike med spoloma pa so se pokazale v cervikalnem nivoju. Ugotavljamo, da bi bila za boljšo primerljivost z drugimi študijami potrebna standardizacija položaja preiskovancev in protokolov merjenja. Ugotovitve potrjujejo pomen uporabe neinvazivnih metod in prednosti kombinacije obeh pristopov za oceno telesne drže, predvsem otrok in mladostnikov. early detection of postural abnormalities. In clinical practice, the plumb line method is commonly used due to its simplicity and speed, while new methods such as the Formetric 4D system are increasingly gaining ground, offering accurate and repeatable measurements. Methods: Data from 35 participants were analyzed. Distances from the vertical line to the spinous process of C7 (PSC7) and L3 (PSL3), as well as the sagittal index, were compared. The results were analyzed in relation to BMI, sex, and age, and were compared with normative values. Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS version 29.0, with statistical significance set at p=0,05. Results: A statistically significant difference between two methods was found at the PSC7 level (p<0,001; α=0,05), while no significant difference was observed at the PSL3 level (p=0,252). The sagittal indices showed good correlation (ICC=0,864). The confidence interval for plumb line measurements fell within the normative confidence (NV) interval, which was consistent across both levels (NV=39,9±16,7 mm; PSC7=37,68–48,03 mm; PSL3=32,98–41,02 mm). Discussion and Conclusion: The results showed good comparability between the two methods, with significant differences only at the cervical level. BMI and age had no effect on the measurements, while sex-related differences were observed only at the PSC7 level. Standardization of subject positioning and measurement protocols is needed for better comparison across studies. These findings support the relevance of non-invasive postural assessment methods and highlight the benefits of combining both approaches for a comprehensive assessment of posture, particularly in children and adolescents. telesna drža sagitalne krivine hrbtenice svinčnica Formetric 4D otroci in mladostniki posture sagittal alignment plumb line Formetric 4D children and adolescents true false false M. Matičič Slovenski jezik Angleški jezik Magistrsko delo/naloga 2026-02-17 12:34:01 2026-02-17 12:34:02 2026-02-18 03:08:01 0000-00-00 00:00:00 2025 0 Maribor 2025 Maribor 69 str. 0000-00-00 NiDoloceno NiDoloceno NiDoloceno 0000-00-00 0000-00-00 0000-00-00 616.711:61-053.6(043.5) 268731651 https://d.cobiss.net/repository/si/files/268731651/173040/Mati%C4%8Di%C4%8D_Mihela_md_2025.pdf 1 8fb33937-0bf4-11f1-bcbc-001a4af901a5 https://revis.openscience.si/Dokument.php?lang=slv&id=15610 Maticic_Mihela_md_2025.pdf Maticic_Mihela_md_2025.pdf 1 786ED829D7661AA86AE3DEF1071F50A2 7582e00aee80047629834de900696d48ca5396e3be45ed59241ce04f03cfbbe3 968028f6-0bf4-11f1-bcbc-001a4af901a5 https://revis.openscience.si/Dokument.php?lang=slv&id=15611 Univerza Alma Mater Europaea 0 0 0