20.500.12556/ReVIS-1648 Pravica do pomoči po naravnih nesrečah magistrsko delo Podnebne spremembe prinašajo v kmetijski prostor številna tveganja. Kmetovalec mora upoštevati tako biotske kot abiotske dejavnike za uspešno rast kmetijskih kultur. Prav tako je pomembno ozaveščanje kmetovalca pri ustrezni izbiri kmetijske površine. S tem mislimo na zgradbo in sestavo tal, vsebnost mineralov v prsti, slojevitost tal, pojavnost organizmov, ki pripomorejo k nastajanju humusa, idr. Vse te pojave lahko omilimo s pravočasnim in efektivnim pristopom (1) seznanjanja ljudi o ustrezni izbiri obdelovalne površine in agrotehničnih ukrepov, (2) s podajanjem ustreznega strokovnega znanja kmetovalcu, (3) s kontrolo varne in racionalne rabe pesticidov ter ostalih biokemijskih pripravkov. Magistrsko delo temelji na razčlembi in podrobni analizi nacionalnega dodeljevanja pomoči pri naravnih nesrečah od leta 2003 do 2013. Prav tako je v delu predstavljena shema sofinanciranja zavarovalnih premij za kmetijske pridelke in živali ter primer bolezni, ki ga financira Ministrstvo za kmetijstvo, gozdarstvo in prehrano RS. Obravnavana so določila, ki se navezujejo na dotično tematiko, sprejeta z akti upravnega sodišča. V inovativnem delu komparativno analiziramo učinkovitost avstrijskega in španskega sistema za dodeljevanje pomoči ter podajamo inovativne predloge za izboljšave dosedanjega sistema v slovenskem prostoru. Po primerjalni analizi avstrijskega modela kmetijskega zavarovanja ugotavljamo, da tam delo opravljajo neodvisni kmetijski strokovnjaki. Ocenjujejo območja, ki jim niso poznana, zato da se zagotovijo pravilni, zlasti pa objektivni odstotki poškodovanosti na posameznih kmetijskih kulturah. Izpostaviti je potrebno, da oškodovanci prejmejo denarno pomoč v roku dveh mesecev. Zatorej v želji po zagotovitvi pravične in enakopravne ocene poškodovanosti na kmetijskih kulturah ob naravnih nesrečah podajamo naslednjo alternativno rešitev: komisije za ocenjevanje škode v kmetijstvu naj opravijo cenitev izven svojih krajevnih pristojnosti. Climatic change has increased the number of risks in agriculture. Thus a modern farmer has to take into account both biotic as well as abiotic factors influencing the successful growing of crops. In addition, there is the need to raise the farmers' awareness of a suitable choice of farming land for a certain type of crops. This includes the structure and composition of the soil, the minerals it contains, the soil layers, the number of living organisms contributing to the formation of humus etc. All these risks can be reduced by a timely and effective approach involving (1) informing farmers about the suitable choice of cultivated soil and agro technical measures, (2) providing suitable professional training for the farmers, and (3) monitoring the safe and rational use of pesticides and other biochemical in farming. Our masterʼs thesis is based on the analysis of the national scheme of government support at natural catastrophes in the years 2003 to 2013. Additionally we present the scheme of co-financing of insurance premiums for crops and farm animals as well as the cases of disease, financed by the Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry and Food of the Republic of Slovenia. We present the regulations, which are governing our theme and were adopted by the Administrative Court of the Republic of Slovenia. Our innovative part involves the comparative analysis of the effectiveness of the Austrian and Spanish systems of awarding government support and includes our suggestions for an improvement of the present Slovenian system. The comparative analysis of the Austrian model of agricultural insurance shows us that this job is done by independent agricultural experts. They evaluate territories they are not acquainted with so as to insure proper and above all objective evaluation of the damage percentage of individual crops. An additional fact we have to stress is that the affected farmers receive financial help within a two-month period. Consequently, in our wish to contribute to a just and equal evaluation of damage on crops as result of natural catastrophes, we suggest the following solution: The commissions performing the evaluation of damage on crops following natural disasters are to act outside the borders of their local jurisdiction. naravne nesreče podnebne spremembe kmetijstvo agrotehnični ukrepi zavarovalne premije dodeljevanje pomoči ocena škode Agencija za kmetijske trge in razvoj podeželja Slovenija magistrske naloge true false false [A. Potočnik] Slovenski jezik Angleški jezik Magistrsko delo 2017-08-24 13:11:15 2017-08-24 13:11:15 2024-06-12 13:54:39 0000-00-00 00:00:00 2016 0 Kranj 2016 Kranj Mag. znanosti; IX, 126 str. 0000-00-00 NiDoloceno NiDoloceno NiDoloceno 0000-00-00 0000-00-00 0000-00-00 338.43.02:656.085.2(043.2) 1024559201 MAG_Potocnik_Andreja_i2016.pdf MAG_Potocnik_Andreja_i2016.pdf 1 A554F394FEF22693EA33ACCF9CCC7F06 f403696b196290b83d8fb332f16573a6ebecb06caaddb0a5995c3cdcb336968e 1a5b9b4f-2897-11ef-9c9e-001a4af901a5 https://revis.openscience.si/Dokument.php?lang=slv&id=1696 Nova Univerza - Fakulteta za državne in evropske študije 0 0 0