<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rdf:RDF xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://revis.openscience.si/IzpisGradiva.php?id=11417"><dc:title>The analysis of the reporting persons protection act through the prism of the OECD indicators</dc:title><dc:creator>Mazi Golob,	Helena	(Avtor)
	</dc:creator><dc:subject>Reporting Persons Protection Act</dc:subject><dc:subject>whistleblowing</dc:subject><dc:subject>protection of reporting persons</dc:subject><dc:subject>whistleblower protection</dc:subject><dc:description>The article presents an analysis of the Reporting Persons Protection Act as an example of a methodology for the substantive evaluation of a new law. The article is divided into three parts. In the first part, standards and examples of good practices in the legislation of countries with a longer tradition in whistleblower protection are collected. In the second part, we analysed the Reporting Persons Protection Act through the indicators of the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). We found that the Reporting Persons Protection Act fully complies with thirteen indicators, partially complies with four indicators, and ignores eight out of twenty-five indicators. Therefore, in the concluding part of the article, we sought the proponent’s arguments for not considering these indicators and suggested some other improvements to the law.</dc:description><dc:date>2024</dc:date><dc:date>2025-01-31 15:22:39</dc:date><dc:type>Neznano</dc:type><dc:identifier>11417</dc:identifier><dc:language>sl</dc:language></rdf:Description></rdf:RDF>
