Show document

A+ | A- | SLO | ENG

Title: Zakon o odvzemu premoženja nezakonitega izvora - dileme in sodna praksa Authors: Režek, Gregor (Author) Šepec, Miha (Mentor) More about this co-author... Language: Slovenian Work type: Master's thesis/paper Tipology: 2.09 - Master's Thesis Organization: EVRO-PF - Nova Univerza - European Faculty of Law Abstract: Temeljni cilj storilcev kaznivih dejanj in organiziranih kriminalnih družb, ki izvršujejo kazniva dejanja, ki generirajo protipravno premoženjsko korist, je, da pridobljeno premoženje zadržijo in "uživajo". V mnogih državah, tudi v Republiki Sloveniji, so aktivnosti organov pregona poleg odvzema prostosti in obsodilnih sodb že dolgo usmerjene v iskanje, začasni zaseg in odvzem nezakonito pridobljenega premoženja. Odvzem premoženja so urejali različni zakoni, leta 2010 pa so poslanci Državnega zbora Republike Slovenije v obravnavo vložili Zakon o odvzemu premoženja nezakonitega izvora(v nadaljevanju ZOPNI). Zakon je v naš pravni red vnesel veliko novosti (odvzem premoženja nezakonitega izvora, ki poteka po pravilih civilnega postopka, institut obrnjenega dokaznega bremena), zato je bilo že ob sprejemu v strokovni javnosti izpostavljenih več dilem. Na začetku uporabe ZOPNI oziroma v fazi obravnave nekaterih odmevnih zadev, ki so organiziranim kriminalnim skupinam prinesle ogromno protipravno premoženjsko korist, je bilo pred Ustavnim sodiščem Republike Slovenije sproženih več postopkov za presojo ustavnosti posameznih členov in tudi zakona kot celote.Ti postopki so bili razlog za prekinitev več pravdnih postopkov odločanja o tožbah za odvzem premoženja nezakonitega izvora, zato so bili do sedaj pravnomočno zaključeni le trije postopki.Magistrsko delo je sestavljeno iz več sklopov. V posameznih sklopih opišem druge zakone, ki vsebujejo določila v zvezi s premoženjem, pridobljenim na nezakonit način, ZOPNI, dileme ob njegovem sprejemanju, podobne predpise treh evropskih držav, odločbe ustavnega sodišča in do sedaj pravnomočno zaključene postopke. Keywords: premoženjska korist, Zakon o odvzemu premoženja nezakonitega izvora, sodna praksa Year of publishing: 2018 Publisher: [G. Režek] Source: Ljubljana COBISS_ID: 2053189302  UDC: 347.234(043.2) Note: Mag. delo 2. stopnje bolonjskega študija; Views: 3549 Downloads: 192 Files:  RAZ_Rezek_Gregor_i2018.pdf (1,03 MB)   Metadata:

Average score: (0 votes) Your score: Voting is allowed only for logged in users. Hover the mouse pointer over a document title to show the abstract or click on the title to get all document metadata.

Secondary language

Language:	Slovenian
Title:	Zakon o odvzemu premoženja nezakonitega izvora
Abstract:	The fundamental aim of the perpetrators of criminal offenses and organized crime groups that perform offenses which generate unlawful material gains is to keep and "enjoy" the acquired assets. In many countries, including the Republic of Slovenia, the activities and objectives of law enforcement have long been focused on prosecution, temporary seizure and the disposession of illegally acquired assets, in addition to convictions and taking one's freedom. Disposession of property was regulated by various laws, while in 2010, the members of the National Assembly of the Republic of Slovenia filed the Law on the Seizure of Assets of Illegal Origin. The law introduced many innovations into our legal system (disposession of assets of illegal origin, which is performed according to the rules of civil procedure, as well as the institute of reversed burden of proof), therefore, several dilemmas had been exposed by the professional public already at its introduction. At the beginning of the application of the Law on the Seizure of Assets of Illegal Origin, namely in the phase of dealing with some high profile public issues, which resulted in immense unlawful material gain for organized criminal groups, several procedures were initiated before the Constitutional Court to assess the constitutionality of individual articles and the law as a whole. The proceedings initiated before the Constitutional Court were the reason for suspension of several legal decision-making procedures on actions concerning disposession of assets of illegal origin, therefore, only three cases have been legally concluded so far.The master's thesis consists of several sections, which describe other laws containing provisions related to illegally acquired assets, the Law on the Seizure of Assets of Illegal Origin (ZOPNI) and dilemmas upon its adoption, similar regulations in three other European countries, the orders of the Constitutional Court, as well as the procedures which have already been legally concluded.
Keywords:	Premoženje

Back