Repository of colleges and higher education institutions

Show document
A+ | A- | Help | SLO | ENG

Title:Primerjalna analiza obtožbe državnega funkcionarja : diplomsko delo
Authors:ID Golob, Danijela (Author)
ID Mavčič, Arne (Mentor) More about this mentor... New window
Files:.pdf RAZ_Golob_Danijela_i2020.pdf (650,50 KB)
MD5: EED4431FB8AF1FA33E71359EC37FFE7A
 
Language:Slovenian
Work type:Final reflection paper
Typology:2.11 - Undergraduate Thesis
Organization:EVRO-PF - Nova Univerza - European Faculty of Law
Abstract:Z institutom ustavne obtožbe (impeachmenta) je definiran postopek obtožbe najvišjih državnih funkcionarjev zaradi hujše kršitve ustave in zakonov. Z drugimi besedami: to je institut za ugotavljanje njihove kazenske odgovornosti % odgovornosti za posamezna protipravna dejanja % in mehanizem za uresničevanje te odgovornosti, s katerim se ob potrdilni obtožbi kaznuje najvišjega državnega funkcionarja. Za lažje razumevanje smo na začetku diplomske naloge najprej opisali pravno teorijo, ki se ukvarja s problematiko instituta šefa države v različnih skupinah državnih ureditev, in odgovornost posameznih državnih funkcionarjev. Temu sledita zgodovinski pregled instituta in predstavitev razvoja ter kazenske odgovornosti državnih funkcionarjev. Med raziskovanjem smo uporabili deskriptivno metodo, s katero smo opisali ključne pojme, ki so povezani s pravno ureditvijo, in primerjalno metodo, da bi ugotovili podobnosti in razlike med državami glede na to, kako se postopek izvede, ter glede na njegove posledice. V končnem poglavju smo se osredotočili na primere obtožb v različnih državah, ki so nam omogočili potrditev hipoteze. Z diplomsko nalogo smo želeli prikazati pomembnost tega instituta % ki ga imajo nekatere države, tudi Slovenija, zapisanega v ustavi % za prevzemanje odgovornosti ob kršitvi.
Keywords:pravna država, politična odgovornost, kazenska odgovornost, sankcije
Place of publishing:Ljubljana
Place of performance:Ljubljana
Publisher:[D. Golob]
Year of publishing:2020
Year of performance:2020
Number of pages:45 str.
PID:20.500.12556/ReVIS-6958 New window
COBISS.SI-ID:34026499 New window
UDC:342(043.2)
Note:Univerzitetni študijski program Pravo I. stopnje; Nasl. z nasl. zaslona; Opis vira z dne 25. 10. 2020;
Publication date in ReVIS:01.12.2020
Views:2533
Downloads:112
Metadata:XML DC-XML DC-RDF
:
Copy citation
  
Share:Bookmark and Share


Hover the mouse pointer over a document title to show the abstract or click on the title to get all document metadata.

Secondary language

Language:English
Abstract:The institute of impeachment defines the procedure for accusing the highest state officials of a severe infringement of the constitution and laws. In other words: it is an institute for determining their criminal responsibility-responsibility for individual illegal acts-and an accountability mechanism, which punishes the highest state officials if the charge brought against them are confirmed. To facilitate understanding, the thesis first introduces the legal theory behind the institute of the head of state in various groups of state regulations, and the responsibility/accountability of individual state officials. This is followed by a historical overview of the institute and a presentation of the development and criminal responsibility of state officials. During the research, a descriptive method was applied to describe critical concepts related to legal regulation and a comparative method was employed to identify similarities and differences among different countries in terms of how the procedure is performed and in terms of its consequences. In the concluding chapter, we focused on cases of impeachments in different countries that allowed us to confirm the hypothesis. The thesis aimed to demonstrate the significance of this institute-which some countries, including Slovenia, enshrined in their respective constitutions-for accountability in case of a violation.
Keywords:impeachment


Back