Repository of colleges and higher education institutions

Show document
A+ | A- | Help | SLO | ENG

Title:Ocena dela in zaupanja do slovenskih institucij v boju proti korupciji : diplomska naloga visokošolskega univerzitetnega študijskega programa prve stopnje
Authors:ID Stibilj, Andraž (Author)
ID Makarovič, Matej (Mentor) More about this mentor... New window
ID Povh, Janez (Comentor)
Files:.pdf RAZ_Stibilj_Andraz_i2013.pdf (1,25 MB)
MD5: 06A5D5B3B1F64505D5B85C1C48042DF4
 
Language:Slovenian
Work type:Bachelor thesis/paper
Typology:2.11 - Undergraduate Thesis
Organization:FUDS - School of advanced social studies
Abstract:Diplomska naloga analizira stopnjo zaupanja in dejavnike, ki vplivajo na oblikovanje stališč slovenskih državljanov v tri najpomembnejše institucije za boj proti korupciji (sodišča, policija in komisija za preprečevanje korupcije) ter jih primerja s samooceno predstavnikov navedenih institucij. Sestavljena je iz teoretičnega in empiričnega dela. V teoretičnem delu sem nakazalmetodološki načrt, ki vsebuje opredelitev uporabljenih raziskovalnih metod, na podlagi katerih sem preverjal postavljene hipoteze, izpeljane iz raziskovalnih vprašanj. Predstavil sem pojmovno podlago besede korupcija in vse, kar sodi zraven tematskega področja. Najprej sem se osredotočil na definicijo besede korupcija, ki je problematična zaradi različnosti poimenovanja med institucijami in avtorji, ki jo v svojih delih obravnavajo. Sledijo vrste in vzroki korupcije, preprečevanje in odpravljanje korupcije, protikorupcijske strategije ter posledice le-te. Četrto poglavje zajema izključno vsebinsko področje korupcije v Sloveniji. Temelji predvsem na poročilu komisije za preprečevanje korupcije, oceni možnosti razvoja korupcije v Sloveniji, ter predstavitvi slovenskih organov in institucij za boj proti korupciji. Temu je dodana še statistika in področje prijav, pogoji preprečevanja korupcije, ter slovenska zakonodaja, ki ureja preprečevanje korupcije.Sledi empirični del, ki je sestavljen iz kvantitativnega in kvalitativnega dela raziskave. Pri kvantitativnem delu sem oceno dela in dejavnike zaupanja v slovenske institucije ugotavljal s pomočjo spremenljivk iz raziskave Stališča o korupciji 2009 iz leta 2010, ki jo je izvedel Center za raziskovanje javnega mnenja in množičnih komunikacij. S pomočjo hipotez sem ugotavljal, kako slovenska javnost ocenjuje delovanje institucij za boj proti korupciji, kateri so dejavniki, ki vplivajo na negativno mnenje o delu institucij in na to, da je korupcija velik problem v Sloveniji. Poleg tega me je zanimalo, kateri izmed institucij anketiranci najprej podajo prijavo korupcije. Ko sem izvedel vse statistične analize, sem hipoteze potrdil oziroma zavrnil, ter odgovore primerjal s samooceno dela vseh treh institucij iz kvalitativnega dela raziskave. Tu sem opravil intervjuje s tremi predstavniki institucij, kar mi je omogočilo dodatno širino oziroma pregled nad zastavljeno problematiko. V zaključku diplomske naloge sem podal še sklepe in ugotovitve preverjanja postavljenih hipotez ter se opredelil do obravnavane problematike.
Keywords:korupcija, zaupanje, dejavniki, sodišča, policija, komisija za preprečevanje korupcije
Place of publishing:Nova Gorica
Place of performance:Nova Gorica
Publisher:[A. Stibilj]
Year of publishing:2013
Year of performance:2013
Number of pages:66 str., [16] str. pril.
PID:20.500.12556/ReVIS-8054 New window
COBISS.SI-ID:1024606017 New window
UDC:343.352(497.4)
Note:Na ov.: Diplomska naloga : visokošolskega univerzitetnega študijskega programa prve stopnje;
Publication date in ReVIS:28.07.2021
Views:1353
Downloads:111
Metadata:XML DC-XML DC-RDF
:
Copy citation
  
Share:Bookmark and Share


Hover the mouse pointer over a document title to show the abstract or click on the title to get all document metadata.

Secondary language

Language:English
Abstract:The diploma thesis analyzes the level of trust and factors that affect the development of Slovenian citizens positions in three most important institutions in the fight against corruption (courts, police and anti-corruption commission), and compares them with the self-assessment representatives of those institutions. It consists of theoretical and empirical work. In the theoretical part I pointed out methodological plan that includes identification of the research methods in which I checked the hypotheses derived from the research questions. I have presented the conceptual basis for corruption and all that goes with its theme. Firstly – definition of the word corruption which is problematic because of the differences between the description of institutions and authors that deal with it. The following-types and causes of corruption prevention and suppression of corruption, anti-corruption strategy and the consequences thereof. The fourth chapter covers the exclusive content of corruption in Slovenia. It is mainly based on the report of the Commission for Prevention of Corruption, corruption assess development opportunities in Slovenia, the presentation of the Slovenian authorities and institutions to combat corruption. To this was added statistics and the number of field applications, single condition to prevent corruption and Slovenian legislation governing the prevention of corruption. The empirical part that follows consists of quantitative and qualitative part of the research. I worked in the quantitative assessment of factors and confidence in the Slovenian institutions by identify and using the variables from the survey Attitudes on corruption in 2009 from 2010, conducted by the Center for Public Opinion and Mass Communication. With the help of hypotheses I identified how the Slovenian public evaluates institutions to combat corruption, which are the factors that affect the negative opinion on the part of institutions and the fact that corruption is a major problem in Slovenia. In addition, I was interested in any of the institutions the interviewed login first to submit corruption. After completing all the statistical analysis, I confirmed or rejected hypothesis, and compared the responses with the self-assessment of all three institutions from the qualitative part of the research. Here I have done interviews with three representatives of the institutions, which has given me more width and a wider overview of the issues raised. At the end of my diploma thesis, I made the decisions and conclusions of the reviewed hypotheses, and I identified to the problem.
Keywords:corruption, trust and factors, courts, police, Commission for prevention of corruption


Back