Repository of colleges and higher education institutions

Show document
A+ | A- | SLO | ENG

Title:RAZUMEVANJE VLOGE STILA NAVEZANOSTI PRI DOŽIVLJANJU PARTNERSKEGA ODNOSA
Authors:Gostič, Eva (Author)
Stepišnik Perdih, Tjaša (Mentor) More about this co-author... New window
Language:Slovenian
Work type:Bachelor thesis/paper
Organization:FUDS - School of advanced social studies
Abstract:V diplomskem delu smo raziskovali razumevanje vloge stila navezanosti pri parih v romantičnem razmerju. V teoretičnem izhodišču smo opredelili naslednje pojme: navezanost na splošno, ljubezen, romantična razmerja, faze nastanka navezanosti, stili navezanosti v odraslosti, doživljanje partnerskega razmerja glede na stil navezanosti in soočanje s konflikti v razmerju. V empiričnem delu smo intervjuvali šest heteroseksualnih parov, torej šest moških in šest žensk. Uporabili smo kvalitativno metodologijo, in sicer metodo polstrukturiran intervju odprtega tipa, kateri je bil razdeljen v štiri tematske sklope (doživljanje odnosa, potrebe v razmerju, konflikti v razmerju in lastno doživljanje stila navezanosti ter vpliva na razmerje). Vsi intervjuvanci sodijo v starostno skupino 20 do 25 let, so študenti ali zaposleni in imajo stalno prebivališče v Sloveniji. V partnerskem razmerju so vsi najmanj tri leta. Med našimi intervjuvanci imajo štirje odklonilno izogibajoč stil navezanosti, šest intervjuvancev varen in dva preokupiran stil navezanosti. V sklopu potrebe v partnerskem razmerju smo ugotovili, da največ intervjuvancev (sedem) potrebuje fizični dotik kot izkazovanje ljubezni, sledita mu posvečen čas (pet) in besede potrditve (pet). S tretjim sklopom intervjuja smo zaključili, da večina intervjuvancev (devet) konflikta ne doživlja kot grožnje, strategije za reševanje konfliktov pa so se med intervjuvanci razdelile v umik (trije) in vztrajanje pri iskanju rešitve (pet), ali pa strategije sploh ni (štirje). V zadnjem delu intervjuja smo udeležence spraševali, kako sami doživljajo svojo navezanost. Vsi so odgovorili, da se počutijo varno v svojem razmerju. Pojavile so se razlike med spoloma, saj so nekatere pojme v odgovorih izpostavile le ženske (želijo si besednih potrditev in komunikacija jim je pomembna), medtem ko so le moški izpostavili drugačno mnenje (ne čutijo potrebe po besednih potrditvah). Poleg tega je polovica intervjuvancev izpostavila, da so močno navezani na svojega partnerja, šest pa jih je povedalo, da jim je zelo pomemben čas zase.
Keywords:ljubezen, stili navezanosti, partnersko razmerje, potrebe, konflikti
Year of publishing:2024
VisID:25877
Views:89
Downloads:6
Files:.pdf 6885$$zakljucno_delo.pdf (1013,12 KB)
 
Metadata:XML RDF-CHPDL DC-XML DC-RDF
  
Average score:(0 votes)
Your score:Voting is allowed only for logged in users.

Hover the mouse pointer over a document title to show the abstract or click on the title to get all document metadata.

Secondary language

Language:English
Title:UNDERSTANDING THE ROLE OF ATTACHMENT STYLE IN INDIVIDUAL'S EXPERIENCE OF PARTNERSHIP
Abstract:In our thesis, we conducted research on understanding the role of attachment style within couples in romantic relationship. In theoretical background we started with defining important subjects, such as attachment in general, love, romantic relationship, phases of forming an attachment, attachment styles in adulthood, experiencing partnership according to one's attachment style and confronting conflicts in relationship. In empirical part, we interviewed six heterosexual couples, meaning six men and six women. Therefore, the qualitative methodology was used, more specifically, the method used was open type, semi-structured interview, divided in four thematic parts (experiencing self-attachment style and the role of it in relationship, needs in relationship, conflicts in relationship and experiencing of the relationship). All participants are aged from 20 to 25 years old, are students or employed. All of them are domiciled in Slovenia. They are in a relationship for at least three years. Among all our participants, four have dismissive-avoidant attachment style, six have secure attachment style and two of them have preoccupied attachment style. Within the context of needs in a romantic relationship, we touched upon the topic of affection, discovering that most interviewees (seven) require physical touch as an expression of love, followed by dedicated time (five) and words of affirmation (five). In the third section of the interview, we found that most participants (nine) do not perceive conflict as threats. Conflict resolution strategies varied among participants, with some opting for withdrawal (three) and others persisting in seeking solutions (five), while some had no specific strategy (four). In the final part of the interview the participants were asked to share how they personally experience their attachment. All participants stated that they feel secure in their relationship. Some gender differences emerged here, with some concepts highlighted only by women (desiring verbal confirmation and valuing communication), while men expressed a different opinion (not feeling the need for verbal confirmation). Additionally, half of the participants emphasized a strong attachment to their partner, with six stating that alone time is crucial.
Keywords:love, attachment styles, romantic relationship, needs, conflicts


Back