Repository of colleges and higher education institutions

Show document
A+ | A- | Help | SLO | ENG

Title:Kakovostna obravnava žrtev nasilja pri sprejemu v bolnišnico
Authors:ID Pogačnik, Špela (Author)
ID Zupančič, Vesna (Mentor) More about this mentor... New window
Files:.pdf 4047$$spela_pogacnik_magistrsko_delo.pdf (3,47 MB)
MD5: EB06AFA56237F1E1BAF88150B5141BDA
 
Language:Slovenian
Work type:Master's thesis/paper
Organization:UNM FZV - University of Novo mesto - Faculty of Health Sciences
Abstract:Izhodišča: Nasilno vedenje je zavestno izvajanje dejanj, ki povzročajo fizično ali psihično škodo, trpljenje ali strah pri drugih osebah (žrtvah). Prepoznavanje nasilnega vedenja zahteva razumevanje, da gre za namerno usmerjena dejanja ali ogrožanje posameznika z namenom povzročitve fizične ali psihične škode, pri čemer se v ospredje postavljajo spremenjeno vedenje, besedne grožnje in neravnovesje moči med vpletenimi. Metode: Uporabili smo neeksperimentalno kvantitativno metodo anketiranja. Podatke smo zbrali s pomočjo anketnega vprašalnika, ki smo ga sestavili na podlagi pregleda literature. Vzorec raziskave je bil namenski in je vključeval 113 izvajalcev zdravstvene nege v bolnišničnih okoljih. Podatke smo zbrali s spletno anketo 1KA po metodi snežne kepe. Pridobljene podatke smo kvantitativno analizirali s pomočjo programa IBM SPSS Statistics 23.0, med statističnimi testi smo uporabili t-test in Pearsonov koeficient. Rezultati: Dejavnika, kot sta spol in stopnja izobrazbe, nista povezana s prepoznavanjem žrtev nasilja pri sprejemu v bolnišnično okolje (p > 0,05). Nasprotno, trdimo lahko, da je višja samoocena usposobljenosti izvajalcev zdravstvene nege povezana z boljšim prepoznavanjem različnih oblik nasilnega vedenja nad žrtvami (p = 0,000). V raziskavi smo dokazali, da ne moremo potrditi povezanosti višje samoocene strokovnih kompetenc z višjo naklonjenostjo do celostnega izvajanja kakovostne oskrbe žrtev nasilja (p > 0,05). Razprava: V prihodnje je smiselno raziskavo izvesti na vseh ravneh zdravstvenega varstva, pri čemer bi izvedli mešano metodo raziskovanja – s kvalitativnim delom bi potrdili ali ovrgli ugotovitve iz kvantitativnega dela.
Keywords:Prepoznavanje, žrtev nasilja, usposobljenost, zdravstvena nega.
Year of publishing:2025
PID:20.500.12556/ReVIS-12583 New window
Publication date in ReVIS:20.11.2025
Views:28
Downloads:0
Metadata:XML DC-XML DC-RDF
:
Copy citation
  
Share:Bookmark and Share


Hover the mouse pointer over a document title to show the abstract or click on the title to get all document metadata.

Secondary language

Language:English
Title:Quality assessment of admitted victims of violence in hospital
Abstract:Introduction: Violent behavior is the conscious performance of acts that cause physical or psychological harm, suffering, or fear in other persons (victims). Recognizing violent behavior requires understanding that these are deliberately targeted actions or threats against an individual with the intent to cause physical or psychological harm, with the focus on changed behavior, verbal threats, and an imbalance of power between those involved. Methods: A non-experimental quantitative survey method was used. Data were collected using a questionnaire developed based on a literature review. The research sample was purposive and included 113 nurses in hospital settings. We collected data using the 1KA online survey using the snowball method. The data obtained were quantitatively analyzed using IBM SPSS Statistics 23.0, and the t-test and Pearson's coefficient were used among the statistical tests. Results: Factors such as gender and level of education are not related to the recognition of victims of violence upon admission to a hospital setting (p > 0.05). On the contrary, higher self-assessment of the competence of healthcare providers is associated with better recognition of various forms of violent behaviour towards victims (p = 0.000). The study showed that we cannot confirm a correlation between higher self-assessment of professional competence and a greater inclination towards the comprehensive implementation of quality care for victims of violence (p > 0.05). Discussion: In the future, it would be useful to conduct research at all levels of healthcare, using a mixed research method – the qualitative part would confirm or refute the findings of the quantitative part.
Keywords:Recognition, violence victim, competence, nursing care.


Back