Show document

A+ | A- | | SLO | ENG

Title: Kakovost bivanja in vpliv financ na upokojence- študija primera v javnem in zasebnem domu starejših občanov Authors: ID Horozović, Indira (Author) ID Raspor, Andrej (Mentor) More about this mentor... Files: 6513$$magistrska_naloga_Horozovic_Indira.pdf (2,14 MB) MD5: 6BC88AE634EB0C98A073ABB0FCF755F5   Language: Slovenian Work type: Master's thesis/paper Organization: FUDS - School of advanced social studies Abstract: Slovenija se spopada s problematiko staranja prebivalstva, ki po uradnih podatkih kaže, da se bo vsako leto delež starejših povečeval vse do leta 2100, ko naj bi bil delež starejših, ki so stari 65 let ali več, kar več kot 32 % prebivalcev Slovenije. Pred leti so glavno problematiko predstavljale čakalne dobe, sedaj je situacija obratna, in sicer prosta mesta v domovih so, vendar primanjkuje kadra, zato nekateri domovi ne morejo sprejemati novih stanovalcev, medtem ko je izbira zasebnih domov bistveno dražja kot javni dom. Različne negativne komentarje o zasebnih domovih lahko zasledimo v medijih, pri čemer trdijo, da bistvene razlike med javnimi in zasebnimi domovi ni, da zasebni domovi služijo le sebi v prid. Zato smo na podlagi raziskovalnega dela raziskali in ugotovili dejansko kakovost bivanja in finančni vidik v javnem in zasebnem domu ter raziskali, da so stanovalci, osebje in družinski člani iz zasebnega doma bolj zadovoljni z bivanjem in oskrbo kot udeleženci raziskave v javnem domu. Zasebni dom starejših občanov je dražji od javnega doma zato, ker javnim domovom nepremičnino za izvajanje dejavnosti zagotovi država, medtem ko si jo morajo zasebni domovi zagotoviti sami, vendar imajo stanovalci enake pravice kot v javnem domu, torej razlik ni. Stanovalci, ki bivajo v javnem domu, bi si želeli bivati v zasebnem, vendar je ključna težava denar oziroma finančno stanje, saj si s pokojnino in s pomočjo družine še vedno tega ne morejo privoščiti. Sodobna družba postaja vse bolj kulturno raznolika. »Državljanov Slovenije manj, tujih državljanov več« je dokaz, da se bodo morali domovi za starejše v sklopu dejavnosti, ki jih izvajajo, udeleževati delavnic glede medkulturnih razlik in medkulturne komunikacije, z učenjem tujih kultur z vidika navad, običajev, prehrane, glasbe itd. Keywords: kakovost bivanja, finance, javni dom, zasebni dom, staranje prebivalstva, boljši pogoji, medkulturnost. Year of publishing: 2023 PID: 20.500.12556/ReVIS-10212  Publication date in ReVIS: 22.12.2023 Views: 668 Downloads: 32 Metadata:    Cite this work Plain text BibTeX EndNote XML EndNote/Refer RIS ABNT ACM Ref AMA APA Chicago 17th Author-Date Harvard IEEE ISO 690 MLA Vancouver : Copy citation

Share: Hover the mouse pointer over a document title to show the abstract or click on the title to get all document metadata.

Secondary language

Language:	English
Title:	Quality of stay and the impact of finance on retirees- a case study in a public and private retirement home
Abstract:	A problem that Slovenia is facing is ageing population, as, according to official data, the percentage of the elderly will be increasing on a yearly basis until 2100 when the percentage of the elderly aged above 65 will considerably exceed 32% of Slovenia's population. A few years ago, the main problem was long waiting periods, whereas the situation is now reverse: spots in retirement homes are available, but there is lack of personnel, so some retirement homes cannot accept new residents and selecting a private retirement home is substantially more expensive than a public retirement home. Different negative comments on private retirement homes can be found in the media, claiming that there is no substantial difference between public and private retirement homes, unless that private retirement homes earn money only for their own interests. For this reason, and based on research work, we determined and studied the actual housing quality and the financial aspect of residing in a public and private retirement home, and found that residents, personnel and family members in a private retirement home are more satisfied with housing and care than research respondents residing in a public retirement home. Private retirement homes are more expensive than public ones because public retirement homes are provided with an immovable property for their activities by the state, whereas private retirement homes have to find their own immovable property; however, residents are entitled to the same rights as in the public retirement home so there are no differences. Residents in a public retirement home would want to reside in a private retirement home, but the crucial problem is money or their financial state, as they cannot afford to pay for the private retirement home only with their pension money or with the help of their families. The modern society is becoming increasingly culturally diverse. "There are fewer Slovenian citizens and more and more foreign citizens" is a proof that retirement homes will have to participate in activities in the field of intercultural differences and intercultural communication in the scope of activities they organise, in order to learn about foreign cultures from the perspective of habits, traditions, diet, music, etc.
Keywords:	housing quality, finance, public retirement home, private retirement home, ageing population, better conditions, interculturalism.

Back