Repository of colleges and higher education institutions

Show document
A+ | A- | Help | SLO | ENG

Title:Dejavniki medgenercijske solidarnosti nekoč in danes
Authors:ID Kink, Jure (Author)
ID Kodrič, Kleopatra (Mentor) More about this mentor... New window
Files:.pdf DIP_Kink_Jure_2025.pdf (1,48 MB)
MD5: 839B4507646F045CD19F2B434A0A4249
 
Language:Slovenian
Work type:Bachelor thesis/paper
Typology:2.11 - Undergraduate Thesis
Organization:UNM FZV - University of Novo mesto - Faculty of Health Sciences
Abstract:Teoretična izhodišča: Diplomska naloga obravnava spremembe v medgeneracijskih odnosih skozi čas, analizira vlogo države in institucij pri spodbujanju medgeneracijske solidarnosti ter identificira prednosti, slabosti in izzive pri ohranjanju vezi med različnimi generacijami. Poleg tega statistično opredeli proces staranja prebivalstva v Sloveniji in drugod po svetu, s poudarkom na EU. V drugem delu s pomočjo intervjuja ugotavlja, kako so se skozi čas spreminjali odnosi med generacijami v kontekstu solidarnosti, kakšno vlogo imajo država in institucije pri spodbujanju medgeneracijske solidarnosti, katere so ključne razlike med medgeneracijsko solidarnostjo nekoč in danes ter kakšni so potencialni ukrepi za krepitev medgeneracijske solidarnosti v prihodnosti. Metode: Izvedeni so bili poglobljeni intervjuji z izbranimi posamezniki iz različnih generacij, da smo lahko pridobili vpogled v njihove osebne izkušnje in mnenja o medgeneracijski povezanosti. Poleg tega so bili za teoretičen del uporabljeni različni viri literature, pridobljeni iz internetnih podatkovnih baz dLib in Google učenjak. Rezultati: Intervjuvanci so deljenega mnenja, saj nekateri menijo, da so bili odnosi med generacijami v preteklosti tesnejši, drugi pa opozarjajo, da je bilo včasih več avtoritarnosti in manj odprtosti. Izzive danes predstavljajo digitalizacija, pomanjkanje časa, razlike v vrednotah in komunikaciji. Starejši se počutijo izključene, mladi pa pogosto nerazumljene. Predlagani ukrepi vključujejo digitalno opismenjevanje starejših, skupne dejavnosti brez tehnologije, prostovoljske projekte in več vsebin o solidarnosti v šolah. Država ima pri tem pomembno vlogo, a opozarjajo, da lahko veliko naredimo že z majhnimi, vsakodnevnimi dejanji. Razprava: Medgeneracijska solidarnost se je skozi čas spremenila – iz močnih vezi v razširjenih družinah je prešla v šibkejše odnose v jedrnih družinah, kar povzroča večjo odtujenost med generacijami. Država ima pomembno vlogo pri spodbujanju solidarnosti z zakonodajo, programi in vključevanjem vsebin v šole. Prednosti solidarnosti so prenos znanja, zmanjšanje osamljenosti in medsebojno razumevanje, izzivi pa vključujejo predsodke, razlike v vrednotah in pomanjkanje časa. Med ukrepi za prihodnost so digitalno opismenjevanje starejših, medgeneracijski projekti in prostovoljske dejavnosti.
Keywords:generacije, solidarnost, razvoj.
Year of publishing:2025
PID:20.500.12556/ReVIS-12285 New window
COBISS.SI-ID:255623171 New window
Publication date in ReVIS:25.09.2025
Views:268
Downloads:14
Metadata:XML DC-XML DC-RDF
:
Copy citation
  
Share:Bookmark and Share


Hover the mouse pointer over a document title to show the abstract or click on the title to get all document metadata.

Secondary language

Language:English
Title:Factors of intergenerational solidarity in the past and now
Abstract:Introduction: This thesis examines changes in intergenerational relationships over time, analyzes the role of the state and institutions in promoting intergenerational solidarity, and identifies the advantages, disadvantages, and challenges in maintaining bonds between different generations. It also statistically outlines the process of population aging in Slovenia and worldwide, with a focus on the EU. The second part uses interviews to explore how intergenerational relationships have evolved in the context of solidarity, what role the state and institutions play in promoting intergenerational solidarity, what the key differences are between past and present intergenerational solidarity, and what potential measures could strengthen it in the future. Methods: In-depth interviews were conducted with selected individuals from different generations to gain insight into their personal experiences and opinions on intergenerational connectedness. In addition, various sources of literature were used for the theoretical part, obtained from online databases such as dLib and Google Scholar. Results: Interviewees expressed divided opinions—some believe intergenerational relationships were closer in the past, while others point out that they were more authoritarian and lacked openness. Today’s challenges include digitalization, lack of time, differences in values and communication styles. Older people often feel excluded, while younger generations feel misunderstood. Proposed measures include digital literacy for the elderly, non-digital shared activities, volunteer projects, and more solidarity-related content in schools. While the state plays an important role, many believe that much can be achieved through small, everyday actions. Discussion: Intergenerational solidarity has changed over time—from strong ties in extended families to weaker connections in nuclear families, leading to greater alienation between generations. The state plays a key role in promoting solidarity through legislation, programs, and integrating relevant content into education. The benefits of solidarity include knowledge transfer, reduced loneliness, and mutual understanding, while the challenges include prejudice, differences in values, and time constraints. Future measures include digital literacy programs for older people, intergenerational projects, and volunteer activities.
Keywords:generations, solidarity, development.


Back