Repository of colleges and higher education institutions

Show document
A+ | A- | Help | SLO | ENG

Title:Ustavno- in primerjalno pravni vidiki kolektivnega upravljanja pravic na avdiovizualnih delih
Authors:ID Drobež, Eneja (Author)
Files:.pdf 12_-_Eneja_Drobez.pdf (124,46 KB)
MD5: 64889414CE210A3846291E21F929DBDC
 
Language:Slovenian
Work type:Article
Typology:1.01 - Original Scientific Article
Organization:FSMŠ - Nova Univerza - Faculty of Slovenian and Internationa studies
Abstract:zadnja novela zakona o avtorski in sorodnih pravicah iz leta 2022 je močno preoblikovala razmerja med ključnimi deležniki pri ustvarjanju avdiovizualnih del, tj. soavtorji, iz-vajalci in filmskimi producenti. Slovenija je sledila novejšim trendom v primerjalnem pravu, ki z neodpovedljivimi in ne-prenosljivimi poplačilnimi pravicami zagotavljajo pravično udeležbo ustvarjalcev na dohodkih iz sekundarnega izko-riščanja avdiovizualnih del. S tem se v evropski uniji krepi položaj kolektivnih organizacij, saj nacionalni zakoni za to-vrstne pravice običajno določajo, da se obvezno kolektivno upravljajo. Po drugi strani pa je treba zaradi ustavnega nače-la pravne varnosti in prepovedi retroaktivnosti iz 155. člena URS preprečiti, da bi nove zakonske določbe posegale v že obstoječa pogodbena razmerja med ustvarjalci in fimskimi producenti. v prispevku bomo preučili naravo novih pra-vic in jih primerjali s podobnimi ureditvami v primerjalnem pravu. Preverili bomo, katere izmed teh pravic bi lahko po-menile izziv z vidika prepovedi retroaktivne veljave pravic in kako naj k temu pristopi zakonodajalec.
Keywords:avtorsko pogodbeno pravo, poplačilne pravice, pravice do nadomestil, avdiovizualna dela, prepoved povratne veljave predpisov, razvoj avtorskopravne zakonodaje
Publication status:Published
Publication version:Version of Record
Publication date:01.01.2025
Publisher:Fakulteta za državne in evropske študije
Year of publishing:2025
Number of pages:str. 297-320
Numbering:[Št.] 104
PID:20.500.12556/ReVIS-13192 New window
COBISS.SI-ID:267630083 New window
UDC:342.7:347.9(497.4)
ISSN on article:1408-9653
Publication date in ReVIS:19.02.2026
Views:18
Downloads:0
Metadata:XML DC-XML DC-RDF
:
Copy citation
  
Share:Bookmark and Share


Hover the mouse pointer over a document title to show the abstract or click on the title to get all document metadata.

Record is a part of a journal

Title:Dignitas : revija za človekove pravice
Shortened title:Dignitas
Publisher:Nova revija, Nova revija, Fakulteta za državne in evropske študije, Fakulteta za slovenske in mednarodne študije
ISSN:1408-9653
COBISS.SI-ID:98923520 New window

Document is financed by a project

Funder:ARIS - Slovenian Research and Innovation Agency

Licences

License:CC BY 4.0, Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International
Link:http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
Description:This is the standard Creative Commons license that gives others maximum freedom to do what they want with the work as long as they credit the author.

Secondary language

Language:English
Title:Constitutional and comparative legal aspects of collective management of rights in audiovisual works
Abstract:the latest amendment to the Copyright and Related Rights Act from 2022 has significantly reshaped the relation-ships between key stakeholders in the creation of audiovis-ual works, i.e., co-authors, performers, and film producers. Slovenia has followed recent trends in comparative law,which ensure fair participation of creators in revenues from the secondary exploitation of audiovisual works through ir-revocable and non-transferable remuneration rights. this strengthens the position of collective organisations in theeuropean Union, as national laws for such rights usually stipulate that they must be managed collectively. on the other hand, due to the constitutional right to legal security, it is necessary to prevent the new legal provisions from interfering with existing contractual relationships between creators and film producers. In this article, we will examine the nature of the new rights and compare them with simi-lar regulations in comparative law. We will examine which of these rights could pose a challenge in terms of the pro-hibition of retroactive effect of rights and how legislators should approach this issue.
Keywords:copyright contract law, remuneration rights, audiovisual works, prohibition of retroactive effect of regu-lations, development of copyright legislation


Back