Repository of colleges and higher education institutions

Show document
A+ | A- | Help | SLO | ENG

Title:Od dvostranskega neuspešnega pogajanja k dogovoru o arbitraži med Slovenijo in Hrvaško : magistrsko delo
Authors:ID Šaruga, Vito (Author)
ID Petrič, Ernest (Mentor) More about this mentor... New window
Files:URL http://revis.openscience.si/IzpisGradiva.php?id=4559&lang=slv
 
.pdf RAZ_Saruga_Vito_i2016.pdf (2,26 MB)
MD5: 816BEE4801FB36E5187D6F2E8946B6B9
 
Language:Slovenian
Work type:Master's thesis/paper
Typology:2.09 - Master's Thesis
Organization:FDŠ - Nova Univerza - The Graduate School of Government and European Studies
Abstract:Magistrsko delo obravnava problematiko določitve meje med Slovenijo in Hrvaško z vidika zgodovinskih dejstev, mednarodnopravnih podlag in političnih odločitev. Po osamosvojitvi je med novonastalima državama skoraj dve desetletji potekal dialog glede rešitve spornih vprašanj v zvezi z razmejitvijo ozemlja oziroma določitvijo meje, kjer ta pred tem še ni bila določena. V času pogajanj na bilateralni ravni je kljub zavezi, da bosta državi spoštovali stanje na dan 25. 6. 1991 in reševali spore na miren način ter se pri tem izogibali incidentom,prihajalo do incidentov v Piranskem zalivu, na spornih ozemljih pri Hotizi in ozemljih ob reki Dragonji. Ker kljub izhodiščem Badinterjeve komisije, asistenci uglednih mednarodnih pravnih strokovnjakov, prizadevanju diplomacij in vlad obeh držav ter jasno izraženimpričakovanjemoziroma zahtevammednarodne skupnosti in evropskih institucij na bilateralni ravni ni bilo mogoče doseči sporazumnega dogovora glede ključnih spornih območij na kopnem in določitve meje na morju,sta se državi na podlagi določb Ustanovne listine Združenih narodov, Deklaracije o načelih mednarodnega prava glede prijateljskih odnosov in Helsinške sklepne listine sporazumeli za mednarodno arbitražo. Temeljni namen arbitražnega sporazuma je vzpostavitev učinkovitega mehanizma za mirno rešitev mejnega spora.
Keywords:arbitraža, Stalno arbitražno sodišče, Republika Slovenija, Republika Hrvaška
Place of publishing:Kranj
Place of performance:Kranj
Publisher:[V. Šaruga]
Year of publishing:2016
Year of performance:2016
Number of pages:VIII, 289 str.
PID:20.500.12556/ReVIS-4559 New window
COBISS.SI-ID:2053178294 New window
UDC:341.6(497.4)(497.5)(043.2)
Publication date in ReVIS:06.08.2018
Views:3053
Downloads:259
Metadata:XML DC-XML DC-RDF
:
Copy citation
  
Share:Bookmark and Share


Hover the mouse pointer over a document title to show the abstract or click on the title to get all document metadata.

Secondary language

Language:Slovenian
Abstract:The master's degree discusses the questions regarding delimitation between Slovenia and Croatia from a historical and international judical as well as the political point of view. After declaration of their independence in 1991 the countries spent almost two decades negotiating over the common frontier on the spots that hadn%t been defined. During the bilateral negotiation both sides committed to respect the borderline from 25. 6. 1991 and settle mutual conflicts peacefully in order to avoid incidents. Nevertheless, there have been incidents in the Bay of Piran, on disputable land by Hotiza and by the river Dragonja. The potential solutions have been offered by Badinter Committee with the assistance of respected international legal experts. Despite of persistent efforts of Slovenian and Croatian governments and diplomacies, the mutual bilateral agreement to settle the terrestrial as well as the sea frontier couldn%t have been reached. However, the International and European Community gave their opinions and demands regarding the problem. The two countries finally reachedan agreement for international arbitrage based on statutory provisions of Declaration on Principles of International Law concerning Friendly Relations and Co-operation among States in accordance with the Charter of the United Nations and Helsinki Final Act. The basic purpose of arbitration agreement is to establish an effective mechanism in order to reach a peaceful solution of the borderline dispute.


Back