Repository of colleges and higher education institutions

Show document
A+ | A- | Help | SLO | ENG

Title:Pravna varnost strank v civilnem izvršilnem postopku : magistrsko delo
Authors:ID Rigler, Mateja (Author)
ID Jerovšek, Tone (Mentor) More about this mentor... New window
Files:.pdf RAZ_Rigler_Mateja_i2017.pdf (1,26 MB)
MD5: 0323AE885DC19214289670AE1FC60FA1
 
Language:Slovenian
Work type:Master's thesis/paper
Typology:2.09 - Master's Thesis
Organization:EVRO-PF - Nova Univerza - European Faculty of Law
Abstract:Vodenje izvršilnega postopka pomembno prispeva k sodnemu varstvu strank. Osnovni namen vodenja postopka je, da se s pomočjo sodne institucije prisilno izvrši terjatev na podlagi izvršilnega naslova ali verodostojne listine, če je posameznik v predpisanem roku ne poravna. Da bi bil postopek pravilno, učinkovito in hitro voden, morajo biti vnaprej jasno določena postopkovna in materialna pravila. V njem izdane odločbe bi morale biti skladne z ustavo in zakoni. V dejanskih primerih tega ni mogoče vedno zagotoviti. Na neučinkovito odvijanje postopka vplivajo določeni instituti, ki so opredeljeni kot zastoji v postopku, in pravna sredstva. Instituti, ki so opredeljeni kot zastoji,so: prekinitev postopka, odlog in ustavitev izvršbe ter nasprotna izvršba. Redni pravni sredstvi, ki vplivata na zastoje,sta: ugovor in pritožba. Poleg dolžnikovega ugovora sov nalogi obravnavani še ugovor tretjega, ugovor novega dolžnika ter ugovor po izteku roka. Če posameznik meni, da so mu z izdano sodno odločbo kršene pravice, lahko vloži še ostala pravna sredstva,kot so: obnova postopka, zahteva za varstvo zakonitosti, opozicijske in impugnacijske tožbe, vrnitev v prejšnje stanje in izločitvena tožba.
Place of publishing:Nova Gorica
Place of performance:Nova Gorica
Publisher:[M. Rigler]
Year of publishing:2017
Year of performance:2017
Number of pages:VI, 152 str.
PID:20.500.12556/ReVIS-4724 New window
COBISS.SI-ID:2053184182 New window
UDC:347.952(043.1)
Note:Mag. delo 2. stopnje bolonjskega študija;
Publication date in ReVIS:13.08.2018
Views:3077
Downloads:201
Metadata:XML RDF-CHPDL DC-XML DC-RDF
:
Copy citation
  
Share:Bookmark and Share


Hover the mouse pointer over a document title to show the abstract or click on the title to get all document metadata.

Secondary language

Language:Slovenian
Abstract:Conducting enforcement proceedings significantly contributes to judicial protection of clients. The primary purpose for conducting the proceedings is to enforce the recovery of claims with the help of a judicial institution on the basis of an instrument or authoritative document whenever the individual fails to settle the claim within the prescribed period. The procedural and substantive rules should be clearly defined in advance to facilitate correct, efficient and quick conduct of the proceedings. The decisions issued therein should be consistent with the Constitution and laws. However, in actual cases this cannot be always guaranteed. Certain legal institutions defined as setbacks in proceedings and legal remedies can affect the ineffective progress of the proceedings. Institutions defined as setbacks are the following: interruption of proceedings, postponement, suspension of enforcement and opposing enforcement. Regular legal remedies that affect setbacks are the following: objection and complaint. In addition to the debtor's objection the paper also discusses third-party proceedings of a new debtor and objection filed after they expiry of the time limit. If an individual believes that their rights have been violated with the issued court decision, they may also file the remaining legal remedies, such as: revision, request for protection of legality, opposing and impugnative actions, restitutio in integrumand exclusionary action.
Keywords:Izvršilni postopek


Back