Repository of colleges and higher education institutions

Show document
A+ | A- | Help | SLO | ENG

Title:Privolitev pri medicinskih posegih v okviru kazenskega prava : magistrsko delo
Authors:ID Kolenko, Patricija (Author)
ID Šepec, Miha (Mentor) More about this mentor... New window
Files:.pdf RAZ_Kolenko_Patricija_i2017.pdf (1,02 MB)
MD5: 4CD6B86D15A45FB9AB85824A68465353
 
Language:Slovenian
Work type:Master's thesis/paper
Typology:2.09 - Master's Thesis
Organization:EVRO-PF - Nova Univerza - European Faculty of Law
Abstract:Za vsak medicinski poseg je potrebna veljavna privolitev pacienta oziroma njegovega zakonitega zastopnika, kadar ta ni sposoben sam podati veljavne privolitve. Institut privolitve pri medicinskih posegih je zagotovljen s petintridesetim členom Ustave Republike Slovenije, kjer je opisano varstvo pravic zasebnosti in osebnostnih pravic oziroma pravica do samoodločbe. Privolitev pri medicinskih posegih je opisana v sedmem poglavju Zakona o pacientovih pravicah. Kazenski zakonik (KZ-1E) institut privolitve v medicinske posege opisuje v 125. členu, izključitev kaznivega dejanja pri telesnem poškodovanju s soglasjem poškodovanca. Privolitev lahke telesne poškodbe ni protipravna, če poškodovanec privoli vanjo. Prav tako naklepna povzročitev hude telesne poškodbe ali posebno hude telesne poškodbe ni protipravna, če je poškodovanec vanjo privolil. Magistrsko delo obravnava institut privolitve pri medicinskih posegih v okviru kazenskega prava. S prikazom razmerja med Zakonom o pacientovih pravicah in Kazenskim zakonikom poskuša prikazati ureditev instituta privolitve, ki je v Sloveniji veljavna danes. Z opisom instituta privolitve, pogojev za veljavno privolitev v medicinski poseg ali zdravstveno oskrbo in različnih oblik privolitve (hipotetična privolitev, domnevna privolitev, nadomestna privolitev) sem poskušala potrditi zadani hipotezi: privolitev v medicinski poseg izključuje njihovo protipravnost ter nujnost medicinskih posegov zmanjšuje pomen obstoja privolitve v okviru kazenskega prava.
Keywords:medicinski posegi, privolitev, odločanje, kazniva dejanja, kazensko pravo, magistrske naloge, bolonjski program
Place of publishing:Ljubljana
Place of performance:Ljubljana
Publisher:[P. Kolenko]
Year of publishing:2017
Year of performance:2017
Number of pages:87 str.
PID:20.500.12556/ReVIS-4879 New window
COBISS.SI-ID:2053180854 New window
UDC:343.2/.7:61(043.2)
Note:Mag. delo 2. stopnje bolonjskega študija; magistrski študijski program Pravo II. stopnje;
Publication date in ReVIS:17.08.2018
Views:3506
Downloads:206
Metadata:XML DC-XML DC-RDF
:
Copy citation
  
Share:Bookmark and Share


Hover the mouse pointer over a document title to show the abstract or click on the title to get all document metadata.

Secondary language

Language:English
Abstract:For any medical intervention, the valid consent of the patient or his legal representative is required where he is not able to give his consent. The Institution of Assent in Medical Interventions is provided by Article 35 of the Constitution of the Republic of Slovenia, which describes the protection of the rights of privacy and personality rights or the right to self-determination. Consent in medical interventions is described in Chapter Seven of the Patients' Rights Act. The Penal Code (KZ-1E) describes the institution of consent in medical procedures in Article 125, the exclusion of a criminal offense of bodily injury with the consent of the injured party. The assurances of light bodily injury are not unlawful if the injured person agrees to it. Also, the intentional causing of serious bodily injury or particularly serious bodily injury is not unlawful if the injured person has consented to it. The master thesis deals with the institute of consent in medical interventions within the framework of criminal law. By showing the relationship between the Patients' Rights Act and the Penal Code, it tries to show the regulation of the consent institute, which is valid in Slovenia today. By describing the consent institute, the conditions for valid consent to medical intervention or medical treatment and various forms of consent (hypothetical consent, alleged consent, substitute consent), I attempted to confirm the given hypothesis: consent to medical intervention excludes their unlawfulness and the urgency of medical interventions reduces the importance of the existence of consent in the context of criminal law.


Back