Repository of colleges and higher education institutions

Show document
A+ | A- | Help | SLO | ENG

Title:Slepa oseba v kazenskem postopku : diplomsko delo
Authors:ID Aćimović, Sanda (Author)
ID Dežman, Zlatko (Mentor) More about this mentor... New window
Files:.pdf RAZ_Acimovic_Sanda_i2016.pdf (1,22 MB)
MD5: 5A9791BE277143A04571628F9C556DF3
 
Language:Slovenian
Work type:Bachelor thesis/paper
Typology:2.11 - Undergraduate Thesis
Organization:EVRO-PF - Nova Univerza - European Faculty of Law
Abstract:Hišna preiskava predstavlja poseg v ustavno pravico nedotakljivosti stanovanja. Odvzem prostosti je največji poseg države v pravice posameznika. Pripor iz ponovitvene nevarnosti mora biti skladen z načelom sorazmernosti. Načelo sorazmernosti je namenjeno omejevanju prekomernih posegov države v pravice posameznika. Sestavlja ga test legitimnosti, kjer je treba odgovoriti, ali je cilj, ki ga zasledujemo, ustavno dopusten. Test sorazmernosti je sestavljen iz treh vprašanj. Ali je ukrep primeren za dosego zastavljenega cilja, nujen v tej meri, da ne obstaja milejše sredstvo za dosego cilja ter sorazmeren v ožjem smislu, ki pomeni tehtanje dveh prirejenih pravic. Uporaba testa sorazmernosti je obvezna za sodišča in državne organe, kadar posega na področje pravic posameznikov. Največji problem je prav prezasedenost Zavodov za prestajanje kazni zapora. Prezasedenost Zavodov vodi v poslabšanje bivalnih razmer za pripornike in zapornike. Če država posamezniku vzame prostost, mora tudi zagotoviti, da odvzem prostosti in izvrševanje kazni potekata tako, da je zagotovljeno spoštovanje človekove osebnosti in njegovega dostojanstva.
Keywords:slepe osebe, hišna preiskava, pripor, invalidni zaporniki, načelo sorazmernosti, človekove pravice in temeljne svoboščine, magistrske naloge, bolonjski program
Place of publishing:Ljubljana
Place of performance:Ljubljana
Publisher:[S. Ačimović]
Year of publishing:2016
Year of performance:2016
Number of pages:V, 40 f.
PID:20.500.12556/ReVIS-5815 New window
COBISS.SI-ID:1024711537 New window
UDC:343.1-056.262(043.2)
Note:Dipl. delo 1. stopnje bolonjskega študija;
Publication date in ReVIS:11.06.2019
Views:3079
Downloads:143
Metadata:XML DC-XML DC-RDF
:
Copy citation
  
Share:Bookmark and Share


Hover the mouse pointer over a document title to show the abstract or click on the title to get all document metadata.

Secondary language

Language:English
Abstract:House search is an invasion of constitutional protection for the home. Deprivation of liberty is an intervention of State in the rights of the individual. Detention of the danger of repetition must be justified by the principle of proportionality. The principle of proportionality constitutes a restriction on excessive government intervention in the rights of an individual. It consists of a test of legitimacy, which is necessary to answer if the objective pursues a constitutionally admissible goal. The second part represents a proportionality test that consists of three questions. Is the measure appropriate to achieve the objective, necessary to the extent that there is no lesser mean to achieve the objective and proportionate in the strict sense, which means weighing two modified rights. Use of the proportionality test is mandatory for courts and public authorities when there exists a restriciton of individual rights. The biggest problem is overcrowding in prisons. Overcrowding leads to worsening of living conditions for detainees and prisoners. If the state deprives an individual of his liberty, it must also ensure that the detention and prison conditions respect human rights and dignity of individuals.


Back