Repository of colleges and higher education institutions

Show document
A+ | A- | Help | SLO | ENG

Title:Zastavna pravica v rimskem pravu in pravu Republike Slovenije : diplomsko delo
Authors:ID Omejec, Žiga (Author)
ID Dežman, Aljoša (Mentor) More about this mentor... New window
Files:.pdf RAZ_Omejec_Ziga_i2019.pdf (764,48 KB)
MD5: D7151B8563EFFBB160E77326892F63D2
 
Language:Slovenian
Work type:Final reflection paper
Typology:2.11 - Undergraduate Thesis
Organization:EVRO-PF - Nova Univerza - European Faculty of Law
Abstract:Diplomsko delo predstavlja primerjalno analizo dveh vrst stvarnopravnih zavarovanj terjatev in sicer ročno zastavno pravico in neposestno zastavno pravico (hipoteko) med antičnim rimskim pravom in pravom Republike Slovenije. Ročna zastava je oblika stvarnopravnega zavarovanja, kjer zastavitelj izroči predmet zastave v posest zastavnemu upniku. Tudi hipoteka je vrsta stvarnopravnega zavarovanja, vendar pa pri njej zastavitelj obdrži posest nad predmetom zastave. Sprva so Rimljani uporabljali le ročno zastavo kot način stvarnopravnega zavarovanja terjatev. Ta način je do določene mere pomanjkljiv, saj mora zastavitelj predmet zastave izročiti zastavnemu upniku, torej ga ne more več uporabljati. To lahko na njegovi strani povzroči mnogo težav, še posebej, če zastavljeno stvar uporablja za pridobivanje dohodkov. Podobno pomanjkljivost najdemo tudi pri fiduciarni odsvojitvi. Postopoma so Rimljani iznašli bolj prefinjen način stvarnopravnega zavarovanja, poimenovali pa so ga hipoteka. Pri hipoteki predmet zastave ostane v posesti zastavitelja, zastavitelj pa je dolžan zastavljeni predmet izročiti zastavnemu upniku pod pogojem, če dolga do zapadlosti ne bi poplačal. Z uporabo opisne in primerjalne metode poskušamo izpostaviti bistvene razlike in podobnosti med ročno zastavo in hipoteko tako z zgodovinskega kot tudi modernega vidika.
Place of publishing:Ljubljana
Place of performance:Ljubljana
Publisher:[Ž. Omejec]
Year of publishing:2019
Year of performance:2019
Number of pages:71 str.
PID:20.500.12556/ReVIS-6089 New window
COBISS.SI-ID:2048014308 New window
UDC:347.233:34(37)(497.4)(043.2)
Note:Dipl. delo 1. stopnje bolonjskega študija; Nasl. z nasl. zaslona; Opis vira z dne 17. 10. 2019;
Publication date in ReVIS:29.10.2019
Views:2219
Downloads:189
Metadata:XML DC-XML DC-RDF
:
Copy citation
  
Share:Bookmark and Share


Hover the mouse pointer over a document title to show the abstract or click on the title to get all document metadata.

Secondary language

Language:English
Abstract:This thesis provides a comparative analysis of the two types of real security called pignus and hypotheca between ancient roman law and law of the Republic of Slovenia. The term pignus descibes a form of real security, where the debtor hands over a thing to the creditor, whereas the term hypotheca is also a form of real security, but in this case, the property meant to secure a debt, stays in the possession of the debtor. At first, the Romans only used pingnus as a way of real security. This manner is somewhat flawed, because the debtor has to give up a pledged thing to the creditor, therefore he can not use it anymore. This can cause numerous problems on the debtor's side, mainly the loss of income, if the pledged thing is used for providing one. Similar flaw can be found in fiducia. When time passed, they developed something more flexible and called it hypotheca, where the pledged thing stays in the possession of the debtor and the debtor only has to give it to the creditor, if the debt is not repaid in time. Through descriptive and comparative research method we want to expose key differences and similarities between pignus and hypotheca from historical and modern perspective.
Keywords:Zastavna pravica


Back