Repository of colleges and higher education institutions

Show document
A+ | A- | Help | SLO | ENG

Title:Postopek izdaje gradbenega dovoljenja : magistrsko delo
Authors:ID Kos, Martina (Author)
ID Jazbec, Milan (Mentor) More about this mentor... New window
Files:.pdf RAZ_Kos_Martina_i2019.pdf (666,51 KB)
MD5: 24A5BB301A1DDC49F88FBB4F5A5C8D94
 
Language:Slovenian
Work type:Master's thesis/paper
Typology:2.09 - Master's Thesis
Organization:FDŠ - Nova Univerza - The Graduate School of Government and European Studies
Abstract:Z uveljavitvijo GZ leta 2018, je jasno navedeno, kdaj se bo postopek izdaje gradbenega dovoljenja vodil po skrajšanem ali posebnem ugotovitvenem postopku. V skrajšanem ugotovitvenem postopku je udeleženec postopka le investitor gradnje, medtem ko so v posebnem ugotovitvenem postopku sodelovali tudi stranski udeleženci, ki imajo izkazan pravni interes za sodelovanje, glede na dolocbe GZ. Z novim GZ je zakonodajalec želel zmanjšati investicijska tveganja in zagotoviti vecjo pravno varnost investicijske namere, saj imajo bodoci investitorji možnost pridobitve predodlocbe, s katero si zagotovijo nameravano gradnjo, brez tveganja hitrih sprememb predpisov. Namen GZ pa je bila tudi odprava težav na podrocju pridobivanja soglasij, kar je rešil s prekvalifikacijo soglasij v mnenja. Združil pa je tudi integracijo gradbenega in okoljevarstvenega dovoljenja, s cemer naj bi se racionalizirali postopki, postali ucinkovitejši, s tem absolutno krajši, cenejši in bolj ekonomicni. GZ je tudi na novo dolocil stranske udeležence, ki imajo pravni interes za sodelovanje v postopku izdaje gradbenega dovoljenja. Zakon tudi omogoca legalizacije izvedenih gradenj pred njegovo uveljavitvijo in brez ustreznih upravnih dovoljenj. Vsaka takšna sprememba zakonodaje pa lahko v prakso prinese vecjo zmedo in zaradi njene nejasnosti vodi v odlocitve, ki za stranke velikokrat niso ugodne, zato te zoper njih uporabljajo tako redna kot izredna pravna sredstva. Ali je bil namen zakonodajalca po odpravi administrativnih ovir in skrajšanju ter poenostavitvi postopka pridobivanja upravnih dovoljenj na podrocju prostora dosežen, je še prezgodaj govoriti. Ko bodo leta 2021 v veljavo stopile vse dolocbe GZ kot tudi Zakona o urejanju prostora (ZUrepP-2), bo oceno lažje podati.
Place of publishing:Kranj
Place of performance:Kranj
Publisher:[M. Kos]
Year of publishing:2019
Year of performance:2019
Number of pages:VII, 96 str.
PID:20.500.12556/ReVIS-6132 New window
COBISS.SI-ID:2048024804 New window
UDC:35.077.3:351.778.511(043.2)
Note:Mag. delo 2. stopnje bolonjskega študija; Nasl. z nasl. zaslona; Opis vira z dne 7. 11. 2019;
Publication date in ReVIS:08.11.2019
Views:4034
Downloads:219
Metadata:XML DC-XML DC-RDF
:
Copy citation
  
Share:Bookmark and Share


Hover the mouse pointer over a document title to show the abstract or click on the title to get all document metadata.

Secondary language

Language:English
Abstract:With the enforcement of the Building Act in 2018, it is clearly stated when the procedure for issuing the building permit will be conducted as a fast-track or special fact-finding procedure. In the fast-track fact-finding procedure, only the construction investor is a party to the procedure, while the special fact-finding procedure can include interveners with established legal interest for participation, based on provisions of the Building Act. With the new Building Act, the legislature wanted to reduce investment risks and ensure better legal protection of investment intent, as future investors can acquire a preliminary decision, which ensures the intended construction without the risk of rapid regulatory changes. The purpose of the Building Act was to also resolve issues in obtaining statements of consent, which it solved by reclassifying consent as opinion. It also merged the integration of the building and environmental permit, thereby rationalising procedures, making them more efficient, absolutely shorter, cheaper, and more economical. The act also re-defined interveners with legal interest for participation in the procedure for issuing a building permit. The act also allows for legalisation of constructions completed before its enforcement and without appropriate administrative permits. Any such legislative change can in practice cause major confusions and, with its lack of clarity, lead to decisions that are frequently not favourable for parties; consequently, parties use both ordinary and extraordinary legal means to appeal such decisions. It is still too early to say whether or not the purpose of the legislature to eliminate administrative obstacles and to shorten and simplify the procedure for obtaining administrative permits in spatial planning had been achieved. Once all provisions of the Building Act, as well as the Spatial Planning Act, enter into force in 2021, the assessment will be much easier.
Keywords:Upravni postopek


Back