Show document

A+ | A- | | SLO | ENG

Title: Prepoved mučenja skozi vidik sodne prakse Evropskega sodišča za človekove pravice : magistrsko delo Authors: ID Trobec, Anja (Author) ID Letnar Černič, Jernej (Mentor) More about this mentor... Files: RAZ_Trobec_Anja_i2019.pdf (1,04 MB) MD5: 800BFF3B37FD32FCD70F297CB0D10C4D   Language: Slovenian Work type: Master's thesis/paper Typology: 2.09 - Master's Thesis Organization: EVRO-PF - Nova Univerza - European Faculty of Law Abstract: Evropska konvencija o človekovih pravicah je s pomočjo Evropskega sodišča za človekove pravice vpeljala enega izmed najbolj učinkovitih in uspešnih mehanizmov za varovanje človekovih pravic. Prepoved mučenja je opredeljena v tretjem členu EKČP in velja za osnovni gradnik demokratične družbe. Določba tretjega člena vključuje tri kategorije mučenja, ki se med sabo razlikujejo po stopnji intenzivnosti. Mučenje, ki se šteje za najhujšo obliko, opredelimo kot naklepno nečloveško ravnanje, ki posamezniku povzroči zelo resno in okrutno bolečino. V nečloveško ravnanje ali kaznovanje uvrščamo nastanek hudega telesnega in psihičnega trpljenja. Pri ponižujočem ravnanju gre za povzročitev slabega ravnanja z namenom, da se pri žrtvi doseže občutek strahu, tesnobe in manjvrednosti. Prepoved mučenja je absolutna temeljna pravica, kar pomeni, da ne sme biti omejena niti v primeru izrednega stanja, ko je ogrožena nacionalna varnost ali zaradi boja proti terorizmu ter organiziranemu kriminalu. Čeprav gre za eno najkrajših določil Konvencije, je Sodišče s svojo sodno prakso razširilo področje varstva tudi na ravnanja zasebnih subjektov. Do kršitve tretjega člena pride največkrat v postopku odvzema prostosti, aretacije, policijskega pridržanja ali med prestajanjem zaporne kazni. Država je dolžna zagotoviti, da je posameznik zaprt v razmerah, ki spoštujejo človekovo dostojanstvo. Da se zagotovi pravico do poštenega sojenja, je potrebno izločiti vse dokaze, ki so bili pridobljeni protipravno na podlagi mučenja. Področje uporabe prepovedi mučenja je ESČP razširilo tudi na primere, ko želi država podpisnica EKČP izročiti posameznika tretji državi, kjer obstaja realno tveganje za mučenje in sorodno ravnanje. Place of publishing: Ljubljana Place of performance: Ljubljana Publisher: [A. Trobec] Year of publishing: 2019 Year of performance: 2019 Number of pages: [XII], 147 str. PID: 20.500.12556/ReVIS-6219  COBISS.SI-ID: 2048034532  UDC: 342.7:343.255(4)(043.2) Note: Mag. delo 2. stopnje bolonjskega študija; Nasl. z nasl. zaslona; Opis vira z dne 2. 12. 2019; Publication date in ReVIS: 03.12.2019 Views: 3310 Downloads: 259 Metadata:    Cite this work Plain text BibTeX EndNote XML EndNote/Refer RIS ABNT ACM Ref AMA APA Chicago 17th Author-Date Harvard IEEE ISO 690 MLA Vancouver : Copy citation

Share: Hover the mouse pointer over a document title to show the abstract or click on the title to get all document metadata.

Secondary language

Language:	English
Abstract:	The European Convention on Human Rights introduced one of the most effective and successful mechanisms for the protection of human rights by means of the European Court of Human Rights. Prohibition of torture is defined in Article III of the European Convention on Human Rights and is considered as the basic cornerstone of a democratic society. The provision of Article III includes three categories of torture which differ according to the degree of intensity. We define torture which is considered as the worst form as intentional inhumane treatment which causes very serious and cruel pain to an individual. We classify the emergence of severe physical and psychological suffering as an inhumane treatment and punishing. In humiliating treatment or punishing, there is a case of maltreatment with the intention to reach a feeling of fear, anxiety, and inferiority in the victim. Prohibition of torture is an absolute fundamental right, which means that it may not be limited even in the case of the state of emergency when there is a threat to national security or because of the fight against terrorism and organized crime. Even though this is one of the shortest provisions of the Convention, the Court has expanded the field of the protection also to the actions of private operators in its case law. On most occasions, the violation of Article III occurs in the procedure of deprivation of freedom, arrest, police detention or during the time of serving the prison sentence. The state is obliged to ensure that an individual is imprisoned in the conditions which respect human dignity. In order to ensure the right to a fair trial, all the evidence which was taken illegally on the basis of torture has to be excluded. The European Court of Human Rights expanded the field of the use of prohibition of torture also to the cases when the Contracting State of the European Convention on Human Rights wishes to extradite an individual to a non-member state where there is a real risk of torture and similar treatment.
Keywords:	Človekove pravice

Back