Repository of colleges and higher education institutions

Show document
A+ | A- | Help | SLO | ENG

Title:Mednarodno kazensko sodstvo od Nürnberga do ICC : magistrsko delo
Authors:ID Keber, Nina (Author)
ID Petrič, Ernest (Mentor) More about this mentor... New window
Files:.pdf RAZ_Keber_Nina_i2019.pdf (617,64 KB)
MD5: 31B1610E581120062C08382422FCD709
 
URL http://revis.openscience.si/info/index.php/slo/
 
Language:Slovenian
Work type:Master's thesis/paper
Typology:2.09 - Master's Thesis
Organization:EVRO-PF - Nova Univerza - European Faculty of Law
Abstract:Mednarodna skupnost je vzpostavila mednarodne sodne mehanizme za pregon in sojenje storilcem, odgovornih za mednarodna hudodelstva. Temeljni cilj magistrske naloge je predstaviti zapuščino mednarodnih kazenskih sodišč, vse od druge svetovne vojne pa do danes. Opisan je način ustanovitve sodišč in pravna podlaga za njihovo ustanovitev. S tem namenom sta v nalogi predstavljeni prvi ad hoc sodišči, ustanovljeni po drugi svetovni vojni, to sta Nürnberško in Tokijsko sodišče. Po več kot pol stoletja pa je Varnostni svet ZN ustanovil t. i. Mednarodno kazensko sodišče za bivšo Jugoslavijo, ki predstavlja velik prispevek k razvoju mednarodnega kazenskega sodstva. MKSJ pa je močno prispevalo k ustanovitvi prvega stalnega mednarodnega kazenskega sodišča, ki je bil ustanovljeno z Rimskim statutom leta 1998. Sodišča so pristojna za najhujša kazniva dejanja mednarodnega značaja, kot so genocid, vojna hudodelstva, hudodelstva zoper človečnost in zadnje tudi za agresijo. V nalogi so opredeljene pristojnosti in razlike med vsemi opisanimi sodišči, sestava in delovanje sodišč, kazenske sankcije, izvrševanje le-teh in seveda sodna praksa. Cilj naloge je tudi opredeliti sodelovanje držav s sodiščema in njihove pristojnosti, predvsem zaradi njihovega zavračanja skozi celotno zgodovino, vse do danes. Z analizo sodne prakse je preverjena učinkovitost sodišč in pomen sojenj v okviru sodišč, predvsem MKSJ in MKS.
Place of publishing:Ljubljana
Place of performance:Ljubljana
Publisher:[N. Keber]
Year of publishing:2019
Year of performance:2019
Number of pages:VIII, 98 str.
PID:20.500.12556/ReVIS-6255 New window
COBISS.SI-ID:2048063972 New window
UDC:341.645:341.4(043.2)
Note:Mag. delo 2. stopnje bolonjskega študija; Nasl. z nasl. zaslona; Opis vira z dne 9. 1. 2020;
Publication date in ReVIS:14.01.2020
Views:2692
Downloads:172
Metadata:XML DC-XML DC-RDF
:
Copy citation
  
Share:Bookmark and Share


Hover the mouse pointer over a document title to show the abstract or click on the title to get all document metadata.

Secondary language

Language:English
Abstract:The International community has set up an international judicial mechanism for the prosecution of the perpetrators responsible for international crimes. The main goal of this thesis is to present the working legacy of the international criminal courts from the second world war till today. I will describe the creation of the international criminal courts and the basis for its creation. With this purpose, the thesis presents the first ad hoc military courts, set up after the Second World War events and the Tribunal in Nürnberg and Tokyo. More than half a century later, UN Security Council set up another ad hoc court, so called International Criminal Tribunal, for the former Yugoslavia. The great achivement of this Tribunal is its contribution to the development of internatonal criminal law. ICTY also had a big contribution with setting up the first permanent international criminal court, which was established by the Rome Statute in 1998. Most of the international courts had or has jurisdiction for the most serious international crimes, such as: genocide, war crimes, crimes against humanity and crime of aggresion. The following thesis presents jurisdictions and differences between all described courts, composition and administration of courts, penalties, enforcement of penalties, shortcomings and advantages and also judicial practice. Nevertheless, the main goal is to define cooperation of states with courts and their jurisdiction, especially because of jurisdiction rejection decisions deriving from whole judicial history till today. Through analysis of judicial practice, I will try to define the meaning of the legal precesses cunducted mostly within ICC and ICTY.
Keywords:Mednarodna sodišča


Back