Show document

A+ | A- | | SLO | ENG

Title: Zakonodaja in financiranje kot omejitve na področju razvoja oskrbovanih stanovanj : magistrsko delo Authors: ID Cinzia Hrobat, Nastja (Author) ID Bogataj, David (Mentor) More about this mentor... Files: RAZ_Cinzia_Hrobat_Nastja_i2020.pdf (1,52 MB) MD5: 84F0B05E0A35A7234B6A634B353A9CFC   Language: Slovenian Work type: Master's thesis/paper Typology: 2.09 - Master's Thesis Organization: EVRO-PF - Nova Univerza - European Faculty of Law Abstract: Z večanjem populacije starejših narašča pomembnost vprašanja solidarnosti, sožitja in umestitve te ranljive skupine ljudi v sodobno družbo. Z daljšanjem življenjske dobe se večajo stroški dolgotrajne, zdravstvene in socialne oskrbe. V Sloveniji prevladuje institucionalen način dolgotrajne oskrbe v domovih za ostarele, ki temelji na kurativi, ne pa tudi na rehabilitaciji in preventivi. Izbira mnogih je staranje v lastnem domu, ker želijo potomcem zapustiti nepremičnino ali si selitve v prilagojeno okolje ne morejo privoščiti zaradi pomanjkanja likvidnih sredstev. Državna politika predvideva deinstitucionalizacijo v smislu okrepitve izvajanja pomoči na domu, ki je sedaj marsikje nedosegljiva zaradi pretežno ruralne poselitve starejših. Takšna okrepitev socialne oskrbe je potrebna, za ohranjanje samostojnosti starajočih pa je nujen tudi razvoj v smeri izboljšanja prilagojenega grajenega okolja, kar predstavljajo bivanjske skupnosti in oskrbovana stanovanja. Področje oskrbovanih stanovanj je v razvoju zastalo zaradi pomanjkljive, razpršene in na mestih sporne zakonske ureditve, skoraj neobstoječih načinov financiranja in slabe pripravljenosti lokalnih skupnosti na prevzem odgovornosti pri izpolnjevanju svojih nalog. V delu smo povzeli aktualno stanje slovenske stanovanjske zakonodaje in zakonodaje s področja dolgotrajne oskrbe. Za nezadostno izvajanje dolgotrajne oskrbe v oskrbovanih stanovanjih je krivo tako pomanjkanje ustrezne zakonodaje, ki bi primerno urejala pravice starejših in način njihovega izvajanja, kot neenotnost in neizvajanje predpisov. Potrebno je sprejeti predlog ZDOZDO za poenotenje področja. Naknadno je treba uvesti spremembe in dopolnitve zakona tudi s področja oskrbovanih stanovanj, ki je urejeno le z dvema pravilnikoma. Praksa kaže potrebo po regulaciji in nadzoru. Predstavili smo finančne možnosti investiranja v gradnjo in preverili realno stanje bivanja v oskrbovanem stanovanju. Država priporočila EU po deinstitucionalizaciji jemlje v smislu oskrbe na domu, kar ocenjujemo za korak nazaj. V delu smo prikazali spregledane prihranke oziroma možnosti za zmanjšanje izdatkov, ki jih vlada lahko ustvari z upravljanjem z riziki in investiranjem v gradnjo oskrbovanih stanovanj. Pripravljenost občin na ustvarjanje primernih bivališč za starejše smo preverili z metodo intervjuja in izračuna razmerja med ponudbo in povpraševanjem po stanovanjih glede na regijo. Institucije na državni in lokalni ravni so slabo informirane in ne razumejo družbenega pomena oskrbovanih stanovanj. Ugotavljamo apatičnost in nepripravljenost občin ter potrebo po izboljšanju komunikacije med oblikovalci politik. Predstavili smo konkretne načine financiranja gradnje oskrbovanih stanovanj, potrebne zakonske ureditve, metode za zmanjšanje stroškov in pomen razvoja v smeri bivanjskih skupnosti, s čimer smo prispevali k strokovni podlagi za razvoj področja oskrbovanih stanovanj. Glavni doprinos dela je dognanje, da z bivanjem starostnikov v prilagojenem okolju podaljšamo njihove sposobnosti samooskrbe in s tem ustvarimo vzdržno dolgotrajno oskrbo. Keywords: oskrbovana stanovanja, bivanje starejših, dolgotrajna oskrba, družbena vrednost, trajnostno bivanje Place of publishing: Nova gorica Place of performance: Nova gorica Publisher: [N. Cinzia Hrobat] Year of publishing: 2020 Year of performance: 2020 Number of pages: XI, 152 str. PID: 20.500.12556/ReVIS-7613  COBISS.SI-ID: 50790915  UDC: 347.2:364(043.2) Note: Mag. delo 2. stopnje bolonjskega študija; Nasl. z nasl. zaslona; Opis vira z dne 9. 2. 2021; Publication date in ReVIS: 10.03.2021 Views: 1877 Downloads: 113 Metadata:    Cite this work Plain text BibTeX EndNote XML EndNote/Refer RIS ABNT ACM Ref AMA APA Chicago 17th Author-Date Harvard IEEE ISO 690 MLA Vancouver : Copy citation

Share: Hover the mouse pointer over a document title to show the abstract or click on the title to get all document metadata.

Secondary language

Language:

English

Abstract:

With the increase in the elderly population arises the question of solidarity, coexistence and the placement of this vulnerable group of people in modern society. The costs of long-term, health and social care rise with increasing life expectancy. In Slovenia, the institutional method of long-term care in nursing homes prevails, which is based on curative care, but not on rehabilitation and prevention. Many choose to age in their own home because they want to leave the real estate to their descendants or cannot afford to move to an adapted environment due to lack of liquid assets. State policy envisages deinstitutionalisation in the sense of strengthening the implementation of help at home, which is now inaccessible in many places due to the predominantly rural settlement of the elderly. Such strengthening of social care is needed, but in order to maintain the independence of the elderly, it is also necessary to develop in the direction of improving the adapted built environment, which is represented by residential communities and sheltered housing. The area of sheltered housing has stalled in development due to deficient, dispersed and in parts controversial legislation, almost non-existent methods of financing and poor willingness of municipalities to take responsibility in carrying out their tasks. In the thesis we summed up the current state of Slovenian housing legislation and legislation in the field of long-term care. Long-term care in sheltered housing is insufficiently implemented due to the lack of suitable legislation that would adequately regulate the rights of the elderly and the manner of their implementation, as well as inconsistency and non-implementation of regulations. It is necessary to adopt the ZDOZDO bill proposal for the unification of the field. Subsequently, amendments to the bill must also be introduced in the field of sheltered housing, which is regulated by only two rules. Practice shows the need for regulation and control. We presented the financial possibilities of investing in construction and checked the actual state of living in sheltered housing. Slovenia interprets the EU recommendations for deinstitutionalisation in terms of home care, which we consider a step backwards. In this paper, we showed the overlooked savings or opportunities to reduce expenditures that the government can generate with risk management and by investing in the construction of sheltered housing. The readiness of municipalities to create suitable housing for the elderly was verified by the method of interview and calculation of the ratio between supply and demand for housing per region. Institutions at the state and local levels are poorly informed and do not understand the social value of sheltered housing. We noted the apathy and unwillingness of municipalities and the need to improve communication between policy makers. We presented concrete ways of financing the construction of sheltered housing, the necessary legal regulations, methods for reducing costs and the importance of development in the direction of residential communities, thus contributing to the professional basis for the development of sheltered housing. The main contribution of v the thesis is finding that with the residence of the elderly in an adapted environment, we extend their self-care abilities and thus create sustainable long-term care.

Back