Repository of colleges and higher education institutions

Show document
A+ | A- | Help | SLO | ENG

Title:Pravna zaščita kitov v povezavi z ureditvijo kitolova Ferskih otokov : diplomsko delo
Authors:ID Čataković, Dijana (Author)
ID Petrič, Ernest (Mentor) More about this mentor... New window
Files:.pdf RAZ_Catakovic_Dijana_i2020.pdf (809,46 KB)
MD5: 4B9DF01EA619A57CA48A5EC51663EAC7
 
Language:Slovenian
Work type:Final reflection paper
Typology:2.11 - Undergraduate Thesis
Organization:EVRO-PF - Nova Univerza - European Faculty of Law
Abstract:Kiti so izjemno pomemben dejavnik v morskem ekosistemu. Z njihovim izumrtjem bi se posledično porušila celotna prehranjevalna veriga morskih živali. Meso kitov (tudi maščobo, olje in kosti) se je dolga leta uporabljalo za prehrano na več območjih sveta, saj je kitolov v človeški zgodovini prisoten že iz časov neolitika. Pretiran kitolov je v desetletjih po drugi svetovni vojni pripeljal nekatere vrste kitov do izumrtja, zato se je v istem obdobju pričelo porajati zanimanje za njihovo ohranitev. Leta 1946 je v Londonu sledil podpis Mednarodne konvencije o ureditvi kitolova. Na podlagi te konvencije se je kasneje v Washingtonu D.C. ustanovila Mednarodna komisija za kitolov (IWC). Tudi zakonodaja Evropske unije ščiti vse vrste kitov pred namerno motnjo, ulovom ali ubitjem. Danska je kot članica Evropske unije primorana spoštovati tovrstno zakonodajo, vendar se na njenem avtonomnem območju Ferskih otokov, ki so sicer odvisno ozemlje Danske, še vedno prakticira tradicionalni kitolov, t. i. grindadráp. Kitolovci Ferskih otokov se sklicujejo na svojo tradicijo in zakone, ki jim omogočajo legalen uboj. V diplomski nalogi s primerjalno metodo predstavljam problematiko neskladnosti med zakonodajo Evropske unije in zakonodajo Ferskih otokov. Pri tej problematiki se poraja tudi vprašanje, ali ima Danska pravno obveznost ustaviti kitolov na Ferskih otokih
Keywords:kitolov, grindadráp, zakonodaja, Danska, Ferski otoki
Place of publishing:Ljubljana
Place of performance:Ljubljana
Publisher:[D. Čataković]
Year of publishing:2020
Year of performance:2020
Number of pages:X, 35 str.
PID:20.500.12556/ReVIS-7878 New window
COBISS.SI-ID:70447875 New window
UDC:341.232.2(043.2)
Note:Dipl. delo 1. stopnje bolonjskega študija; Nasl. z nasl. zaslona; Opis vira z dne 16. 7. 2021;
Publication date in ReVIS:23.07.2021
Views:1356
Downloads:111
Metadata:XML DC-XML DC-RDF
:
Copy citation
  
Share:Bookmark and Share


Hover the mouse pointer over a document title to show the abstract or click on the title to get all document metadata.

Secondary language

Language:English
Abstract:Whales are an extremely important component of the marine ecosystem. In the event f their extinction, the entire marine food chain would collapse. Whaling has been part of human history since the Neolithic, due to the use of the meat (as well as fat, oil and bones) for sustenance in many parts of the world. Overwhaling in the decades after WWII pushed some whale species into extinction, which sparked interest in whale conservation during that same time. In 1946, the International Convention for the Regulation of Whaling was signed in London. Later, the International Whaling Commission was set up by the terms of the convention in Washington D.C. All species of whales are also protected by the EU legislation from deliberate interference, hunting or killing. As a member of the European Union, Denmark must respect this legislation, although they still practice traditional whaling, so called grindadráp, in the autonomous territory of the Faroe islands, which fall within the Kingdom of Denmark. The Faroese whalers refer to their tradition and the laws which allow legal killings. In this thesis, I use the comparative method to present the issue of inconsistency between the EU legislation and the Faroe islands legislation. This issue brings forth the question whether Denmark has the legal obligation of ending whaling in the Faroe islands


Back