Repository of colleges and higher education institutions

Show document
A+ | A- | Help | SLO | ENG

Title:Načelo nepristranskosti in nevtralnosti ter načelo enakopravnosti v mediaciji : magistrsko delo
Authors:ID Šutej, Klaudia (Author)
ID Jazbec, Milan (Mentor) More about this mentor... New window
Files:.pdf RAZ_Sutej_Klaudia_i2019.pdf (1,66 MB)
MD5: 4353503849DCA92E36105391BD503A5A
 
Language:Slovenian
Work type:Master's thesis/paper
Typology:2.09 - Master's Thesis
Organization:EVRO-PF - Nova Univerza - European Faculty of Law
Abstract:Poleg sodnega postopka poznamo tudi druge možnosti za uspešno razrešitev spora. Mirno reševanje sporov pomeni razširitev možnosti dostopa do pravnega varstva in razbremenitev sodišč. Alternativne oblike reševanja sporov pomenijo mirni način reševanja sporov. Najbolj prepoznavna oblika je mediacija. Postopek mediacije se lažje prilagodi željam in potrebam strank, saj so procesna pravila mediacije prožnejša in jih je lažje individualno prilagajati. Mediacija poteka ob pomoči nevtralne in nepristranske osebe - mediatorja, ki nima moči sprejemanja zavezujočih odločitev. Stranke usmerja in vodi skozi mediacijski postopek k oblikovanju in na koncu k sprejetju sporazumne rešitve. Svoj dogovor lahko stranki zapišeta v obliki sporazuma, ki lahko postane zanju pravno zavezujoč. Mediacija si prizadeva za celovit pristop k razreševanju ne samo konkretnega spora, temveč celotnega spornega razmerja. Dolgoročni cilji, ki se z mediacijo zasledujejo so zmanjšanje potencialnih bodočih sporov in večje zadovoljstvo strank glede izida postopka. Za mediacijo so bistvena temeljna načela, ki so v pomoč tako strankam kot mediatorju. Kljub neformalnosti mediacijskega postopka, so zanj značilne določene faze. Pri tem se morajo spoštovati temeljna načela. Na določena temeljna načela s strani strank ni moč vplivati, zato jih je potrebno spoštovati do konca postopka. Med pomembna načela štejemo načelo prostovoljnosti, enakopravnosti, nepristranskosti mediatorja in zaupnosti. Načelo nepristranskosti in nevtralnosti pomeni, da mediator v mediacijskem postopku deluje nepristransko, nevtralno in neodvisno. Postopek mediacije se ne sme začeti niti nadaljevati v določenih primerih. To nastopi takrat, ko bi okoliščine, če bi bile prisotne, vplivale na mediatorjevo neodvisno in nepristransko delovanje. Te okoliščine mora strankam nemudoma razkriti. Dolžnost ga veže ves čas postopka. V kolikor se dvomi o delovanju mediatorja glede njegove nepristranskosti, imata stranki možnost za njegovo zamenjavo. Načelo enakopravnosti v mediaciji se povezuje z načelom nepristranskosti. To pomeni, da sta obe stranki s strani mediatorja deležni obravnave, ki mora biti enakopravna. Stranki morata imeti možnost skupno oblikovati postopek, prosto izjavljati svojo voljo in ponudbo ter prosto odločati o sklenitvi poravnave. Gre za ustavno načelo enakega varstva pravic. Če mediator ravnovesja moči med strankama ne more vzpostaviti ali ohraniti, mora umakniti soglasje
Keywords:spori, alternativno reševanje sporov, mediacija, mediator, načelo nepristranskosti in nevtralnosti mediatorja, načelo enakopravnosti strank v mediaciji.
Place of publishing:Ljubljana
Place of performance:Ljubljana
Publisher:[K. Šutej]
Year of publishing:2019
Year of performance:2019
Number of pages:VIII, 96 str.
PID:20.500.12556/ReVIS-7928 New window
COBISS.SI-ID:70558723 New window
UDC:347(043.2)
Note:Mag. delo 2. stopnje bolonjskega študija; Nasl. z nasl. zaslona; Opis vira z dne 18. 7. 2021;
Publication date in ReVIS:27.07.2021
Views:1457
Downloads:136
Metadata:XML DC-XML DC-RDF
:
Copy citation
  
Share:Bookmark and Share


Hover the mouse pointer over a document title to show the abstract or click on the title to get all document metadata.

Secondary language

Language:English
Abstract:A legal proceeding is not always the most adequate method of resolving a dispute. Alternative dispute resolution means an expansion of possibilities to access legal protection and relieve the courts. An alternative dispute resolution represents a peaceful method of resolving disputes, mediation being the most distinctive form. The process of mediation is easier to adjust to the parties% wishes and needs since procedural rules of mediation are more flexible and easier to adjust individually. Mediation is conducted in cooperation with a third, neutral and impartial person % mediator % who does not have the power to make binding decisions. They direct and guide the parties through the mediation process towards the creation and, finally, adoption of a friendly solution. The parties may formalise their arrangement in a form of an agreement, which may become legally binding. Mediation is aimed at a comprehensive approach to solving not only a specific dispute, but the entire relationship in dispute as well. The long-term objectives of mediation include reduction of the number of possible future disputes and greater satisfaction of parties regarding the outcome of the process. Key principles are essential to mediation, which are helpful for both the parties and mediator. Despite the informality of the mediation process, it should be carried out in certain stages with regard to the key principles. Some general key principles cannot be influenced by the parties, which is why they need to be followed to the end of the process. The most important principles are: voluntariness, equality of parties, confidentiality and mediator%s impartiality. Principle of mediator%s impartiality and neutrality means that the mediator should at all time act completely impartially, neutrally and independently towards the parties and until the outcome of the mediation process. The mediator may not start nor continue the process in case of circumstances that may affect the mediator%s independence and impartiality. Such circumstances need to be immediately disclosed to the parties. The mediator is bound by that duty throughout the process. If doubts arise as to the mediator%s impartiality, the parties may request exclusion of the mediator. The principle of equality of parties in the mediation process is connected to the principle of impartiality, which means that the mediator should treat the parties equally. The parties should have equal opportunities at co-creating the process, expressing their will and offers, as well as free choice on negotiating a settlement. It is a constitutional principle of equal protection of rights. If the mediator is unable to establish or maintain the balance of powers between the parties, the former should withdraw their consent


Back