Repository of colleges and higher education institutions

Show document
A+ | A- | Help | SLO | ENG

Title:Čuteča bitja ali stvari? : diplomsko delo
Authors:ID Najdenov, Nina (Author)
ID Ahlin Doljak, Sara (Mentor) More about this mentor... New window
Files:.pdf RAZ_Najdenov_Nina_i2021.pdf (330,24 KB)
MD5: 53F8CC8F35E28117AA811E3C1AC9685E
 
Language:Slovenian
Work type:Final reflection paper
Typology:2.11 - Undergraduate Thesis
Organization:EVRO-PF - Nova Univerza - European Faculty of Law
Abstract:Ideja varstva pravic živali in skrbi za njihovo dobrobit je globalno prisotna že vrsto let, v sodobnem času pa se vse bolj uveljavlja intenziven interes za skrb in varstvo živali tudi v okviru prava. Znanstvene raziskave, predvsem na področju etologije in evolucijske biologije, že vrsto let ugotavljajo in opozarjajo, da imajo živali izredno kompleksna čustvena doživljanja in življenja. Evropska unija priznava živali kot čuteča bitja in zavezuje države članice k spoštljivemu in primernemu ravnanju z njimi. Tudi tuje zakonodaje vse bolj zaostrujejo pogoje ravnanja in uporabo živali. Skladno s temi, spremembami, je Slovenija leta 2020 naredila pomemben korak nasproti živalim naklonjeni zakonodaji. Na področju civilnega prava je bila sprejeta novela SPZ-B, ki je uvedla vrednostno spremembo pravnega statusa živali. Iz 15.a člena Stvarnopravnega zakonika izhaja, da so živali čuteča živa bitja in so kot taka izvzeta iz definicije stvari v 15. členu Stvarnopravnega zakonika. V slovenski zakonodaji je že pred novelo SPZ-B obstajalo implicitno razločevanje med stvarmi in živalmi, na kar je opozorila tudi sodna praksa. Omenjena novela SPZ-B pa je s spremembo pravnega statusa živali povzročila kompleksne posledice glede ureditev živali tudi v okviru kazenskega prava. Čas bo pokazal, ali omenjena dopolnitev doprinaša v slovensko zakonodajo vrednostno pridobitev, ki bo spodbudila prizadevanje za izboljšanje pravne ureditve varstva in zaščite živali v celoti, ali pa bo v praksi preprosto ostala le mrtva črka na papirju
Keywords:živali kot stvari, živali kot čuteča bitja, novela SPZ-B, 15.a člen SPZ, čuteča bitja
Place of publishing:Ljubljana
Place of performance:Ljubljana
Publisher:[N. Najdenov]
Year of publishing:2021
Year of performance:2021
Number of pages:1 spletni vir (1 datoteka PDF (39 str.))
PID:20.500.12556/ReVIS-8633 New window
COBISS.SI-ID:92606211 New window
UDC:347.191.11(043.2)
Note:Dipl. delo 1. stopnje bolonjskega študija; Nasl. z nasl. zaslona; Opis vira z dne 9. 1. 2022;
Publication date in ReVIS:13.01.2022
Views:1448
Downloads:61
Metadata:XML DC-XML DC-RDF
:
Copy citation
  
Share:Bookmark and Share


Hover the mouse pointer over a document title to show the abstract or click on the title to get all document metadata.

Secondary language

Language:English
Abstract:The idea of protecting animal rights and caring for their welfare has been globally present for many years, and in modern times there is an intense interest in animal care and protection which is also being exercised within the law. Scientific research, particularly in the field of ethology and evolutionary biology, has been discovering and informing for many years that animals have extremely complex emotional experiences and lives. The European Union recognises animals as sentient beings and commits member states to treat them with respect and appropriate handling. Foreign legislation is also increasingly tightening the conditions of handling and use of animals. Accordingly, in 2020 Slovenia has taken an important step towards animal-friendly legislation. In the field of civil law, the SPZ-B amendment was adopted, which introduced the value-based change legal status of animals. From article 15a of the Real Property Code follows that animals are sentient living beings and, as such, are excluded from the definition of things in article 15 of the Real Property Code. There was an implicit distinction between things and animals before the SPZ-B, which was also pointed out by the case law. However, the amendment SPZ-B has, by changing the legal status of animals, had complex consequences with regard to the regulation of animals also in the context of criminal law. Only time will tell whether this amendment adds value to the Slovenian legislation, which will stimulate efforts to improve the legal framework of animals as a whole, or whether it will simply remain a dead letter on a paper in practice


Back