Show document

A+ | A- | | SLO | ENG

Title: Odgovornost dedičev za zapustnikove dolgove : magistrsko delo Authors: ID Krajnc, Barbara (Author) ID Dežman, Aljoša (Mentor) More about this mentor... Files: RAZ_Krajnc_Barbara_i2021.pdf (560,89 KB) MD5: 6D5C291FC10FEDF66C4B1710EC8D6DBE   Language: Slovenian Work type: Master's thesis/paper Typology: 2.09 - Master's Thesis Organization: EVRO-PF - Nova Univerza - European Faculty of Law Abstract: Čas, v katerem živimo, je prinesel veliko sprememb in nekatere od teh sprememb so imele za posledico tudi bistveno poslabšanje premoženjskega stanja prebivalcev, krize, ki so se pojavljale, pa so imele za posledico, da upniki svojih obveznosti zaradi bistvenih sprememb, ki so nastopile po prevzemu obveznosti, niso več mogli izpolnjevati. Neizpolnjevanje obveznosti pa je imelo za posledico nastanek dolgov. Neporavnane obveznosti dolžnikov se odraža tudi v zapuščinskih postopkih. Postavljala se vprašanje zadolženosti ali celo prezadolženosti zapustnika, kar vse vpliva po eni strani na obseg zapuščine, po drugi strani pa na odgovornost dedičev, ki imajo v zapuščinskem postopku različen položaj. Prav situacije, ki nastanejo v zapuščinskih postopkih zaradi uveljavljanja zahtevkov upnikov v pravdnih postopkih, zato ker zapuščinsko sodišče v zapuščinskem postopku spornih vprašanj ne more rešiti samo, kar ima za posledico prekinitev zapuščinskega postopka in napotitev na pravdo. Ne nazadnje se tudi v izvršilnih postopkih odpira vrsta vprašanj, kar je razlog, da magistrska naloga obravnava odgovornost dedičev za zapustnikove dolgove. Odgovornost dedičev za dolgove zapustnika ureja ZD, ki pa ni urejal pravnega položaja enakopravne obravnave upnikov zapustnika v primeru prezadolženosti. Pravni položaj upnikov v primeru prezadolženosti ureja ZFPPIPP, ki je uvedel institut stečaja zapuščine. Magistrska naloga ne obravnava ureditve po ZFPPIPP, odgovarja na vprašanja odgovornosti dedičev za zapustnikove dolgove v delu, kot je to urejeno v ZD v povezavi z OZ in ZIZ, ki ga sodišče v postopkih izterjave dolgov upnikov iz premoženja zapustnika uporablja, hkrati pa odpira tudi vprašanja. Zadolženost zapustnika obravnava sodna praksa v samem zapuščinskem postopku, kjer lahko upniki prijavljajo svoje terjatve, na strani dedičev pa je, da jih priznajo ali ne, kar ne povzroča posebnih dilem. Problemi pa se odpirajo pri odgovoru na vprašanje glede višine vrednosti podedovanega premoženja in odgovornosti dedičev in ne nazadnje tudi odgovornost dedičev do upnika, ki je zahteval izločitev zapustnikovega premoženja iz zapuščine. Keywords: dedovanje, zapuščina, odgovornost, dediča, dolgovi zapustnika, ločitev zapuščine Place of publishing: Ljubljana Place of performance: Ljubljana Publisher: [B. Krajnc] Year of publishing: 2021 Year of performance: 2021 Number of pages: 1 spletni vir (1 datoteka PDF (74 str.)) PID: 20.500.12556/ReVIS-8651  COBISS.SI-ID: 95158531  UDC: 347.65/.68(043.2) Note: Mag. delo 2. stopnje bolonjskega študija; Nasl. z nasl. zaslona; Opis vira z dne 26. 1. 2022; Publication date in ReVIS: 28.01.2022 Views: 1510 Downloads: 92 Metadata:    Cite this work Plain text BibTeX EndNote XML EndNote/Refer RIS ABNT ACM Ref AMA APA Chicago 17th Author-Date Harvard IEEE ISO 690 MLA Vancouver : Copy citation

Share: Hover the mouse pointer over a document title to show the abstract or click on the title to get all document metadata.

Secondary language

Language:

English

Abstract:

The times we live in have brought many changes and some of these changes have also resulted in a significant deterioration of the financial situation of the population, and the crises that emerged caused that the creditors were no longer able to meet their obligations due to significant changes that have occurred after they committed to them. Inability to settle obligations resulted in the rise of debts. And, inability to settle obligations is reflected also in probate proceedings. The issue of indebtedness or even over-indebtedness of the testator is raised, which all affects, on the one hand, the volume of the estate and, on the other, the liability of heirs who have various positions in the probate proceedings. It is precisely the situations that arise in probate proceedings due to enforcement of creditors’ claims in litigation proceedings, as the probate court is unable to solve the dispute itself, result in termination of probate proceedings and referring the parties to a suit, and subsequently lengthy probate proceedings. Finally, numerous issues arise in enforcement proceedings, which is the reason why this Master's Thesis deals with the responsibility of heirs for the testator’s debts. The responsibility of heirs for the testator’s debts is governed by the ZD, which does not regulate the legal status of equal treatment of the testator’s creditors in the event of over-indebtedness. The legal position of creditors in the event of over-indebtedness is governed by the ZFPPIPP, which introduced the institute called the bankruptcy of legacy. The Master's Thesis does not deal with the regulation under the ZFPPIPP, answers questions of liability of heirs for the testator’s debts in the part as regulated in the ZD in connection with the Code of Obligations (OZ) and in connection with the Enforcement and Security Act (ZIZ), which the court applies in proceedings to recover creditors' debts from the testator's property, and at the same time it raises questions to which identical cases the case law gives different answers. The testator’s indebtedness is dealt with by the case law in the probate proceedings, where creditors can lodge their claims, and it is up to the heirs to recognize them or not, which does not cause any special dilemmas. Problems arise in answering the question about the value of the inherited estate and the responsibility of heirs and, last but not least, the responsibility of heirs toward the creditor, who required the exclusion of the testator's assets from the estate and the responsibility of the heirs toward the creditor, who did not require separation of the assets from the estate.

Back