Repository of colleges and higher education institutions

Show document
A+ | A- | Help | SLO | ENG

Title:Predstavitev odločitev Meddržavnega sodišča v Haagu o imuniteti diplomatov in državnih funkcionarjev : diplomsko delo
Authors:ID Bučan, Tim (Author)
ID Petrič, Ernest (Mentor) More about this mentor... New window
Files:.pdf RAZ_Bucan_Tim_i2021.pdf (472,37 KB)
MD5: F56DEF7B40453B823731B39267EBCE81
 
Language:Slovenian
Work type:Final reflection paper
Typology:2.11 - Undergraduate Thesis
Organization:EVRO-PF - Nova Univerza - European Faculty of Law
Abstract:Avtor se v svojem diplomskem delu loti vprašanja imunitete diplomatov in visokih državnih funkcionarjev, predvsem pred kazensko jurisdikcijo tujih držav. Na začetku dela avtor najprej predstavi nekatere osnovne pojme, katerih opredelitev in razumevanje je po mnenju avtorja ključno za razumevanje obravnavane teme. Samo jedro diplomskega dela sestavljajo predstavitve in obravnavanja nekaterih bolj odmevnih odločitev Mednarodnega sodišča v Haagu v povezavi s problematiko imunitete visokih državnih funkcionarjev. Obravnavani primeri v diplomskem delu so: Arrest warrant case, (Demokratična Republika Kongo v. Belgija, 2002), Certain Questions of Mutual Assistance in Criminal Matters (Džibuti v. Francija, 2008), Immunities and Criminal Proceedings (Ekvatorialna Gvineja v. Francija, 2018) in Jurisdictional Immunities of the State (Nemčija v. Italija; posreduje Grčija, 2012). Vse štiri primere avtor najprej kratko povzame, nato pa se poglobi v odločitve sodišča, pri čemer se fokusira predvsem na vprašanja imunitete pred kazensko jurisdikcijo tujih držav in njenih upravičencev. V nadaljevanju s primerjalno metodo navede skupne točke v odločitvah Meddržavnega sodišča v Haagu, ter morebitne divergence med njimi. Pri tem, kot delno tudi med samo analizo primerov, si avtor pomaga z različnimi relevantnimi pravnimi akti kot tudi strokovno literaturo. Končno avtor povzame ugotovitve, do katerih je prišel z analizo omenjenih primerov, ter poda svoje mnenje glede obravnavane problematike.
Keywords:imuniteta, diplomati, državni funkcionarji, odločitve Meddržavnega sodišča v Haagu, kazenska jurisdikcija tujih držav, mednarodno običajno pravo
Place of publishing:Ljubljana
Place of performance:Ljubljana
Publisher:[T. Bučan]
Year of publishing:2021
Year of performance:2021
Number of pages:1 spletni vir (1 datoteka PDF (42 str.))
PID:20.500.12556/ReVIS-8762 New window
COBISS.SI-ID:102130691 New window
UDC:341.7:342.534.2(043.2)
Note:Dipl. delo 1. stopnje bolonjskega študija; Nasl. z nasl. zaslona; Opis vira z dne 24. 3. 2022;
Publication date in ReVIS:31.03.2022
Views:1446
Downloads:66
Metadata:XML DC-XML DC-RDF
:
Copy citation
  
Share:Bookmark and Share


Hover the mouse pointer over a document title to show the abstract or click on the title to get all document metadata.

Secondary language

Language:English
Abstract:In his dissertation, the author addresses the issue of immunity of diplomats and high-ranking state officials, especially before the criminal jurisdiction of foreign countries. At the beginning of his dissertation, the author first defines some key words, the definition and understanding of which, in the author's opinion, is crucial for understanding of the topic at hand. The very core of the dissertation consists of presentations and discussions of some of the more resounding decisions of the International Court of Justice in The Hague in connection with the issue of immunity of high state officials. Examples discussed in the thesis are: Arrest warrant case, (Democratic Republic of Congo v. Belgium, 2002), Certain Questions of Mutual Assistance in Criminal Matters, (Djibouti v. France, 2008), Immunities and Criminal Proceedings, (Equatorial Guinea v. France, 2018) and Jurisdictional Immunities of the State (Germany v. Italy; Greece intervening, 2012). The author first summarizes all four cases and then delves into court decisions, focusing mainly on issues of immunity from the criminal jurisdiction of foreign countries and its beneficiaries. It then uses the comparative method to indicate the common points in the Court's decisions and any divergences between them. In doing so, as in part during the analysis of cases, the author uses various relevant legal acts as well as judicial literature. Finally, the author summarizes the findings of the analysis of these cases and gives his opinion on the issue.


Back