71. FIZIOTERAPEVTSKI POMEN RAČUNALNIŠKE DINAMIČNEPOSTUROGRAFIJE PRI OBRAVNAVI MOTENJ RAVNOTEŽJAIuna Kokelj, 2026, undergraduate thesis Abstract: Diplomsko delo obravnava področje motenj ravnotežja, ki predstavljajo velik zdravstveni in socialni problem, saj povečujejo tveganje za padce ter zmanjšujejo kakovost življenja. Osrednji problem, ki smo ga raziskovali, je vloga in pomen računalniške dinamične posturografije kot napredne tehnologije v fizioterapevtski obravnavi. Namen naloge je bil pregledati strokovno in znanstveno literaturo o fizioterapevtskem pomenu RDP, cilji pa so vključevali predstavitev teoretičnih izhodišč ravnotežja, opis delovanja naprave ter opredelitev njene uporabnosti pri osebah z različnimi motnjami stabilnosti. Pri tem smo želeli ugotoviti tudi, v kolikšni meri uporaba RDP v klinični praksi prispeva k bolj objektivni oceni ravnotežja in učinkovitejšemu načrtovanju rehabilitacijskih postopkov. V razpravi smo si zastavili dve hipotezi: (H1) da RDP omogoča objektivno in zanesljivo oceno ravnotežnih sposobnosti ter (H2) da uporaba te metode v fizioterapevtski praksi prispeva k učinkovitejšemu načrtovanju in spremljanju rehabilitacijskih programov. V sistematični pregled literature smo vključili 14 znanstvenih študij, objavljenih v uveljavljenih mednarodnih revijah, kar zagotavlja visoko kakovost in relevantnost pridobljenih podatkov. Rezultati analize so pokazali, da RDP s svojo sposobnostjo izolacije senzoričnih prilivov nudi natančnejše diagnostične informacije kot standardni klinični testi, hkrati pa omogoča hitrejšo nevromišično adaptacijo. Na podlagi zbranih dokazov smo obe hipotezi potrdili. Ključna ugotovitev naloge je, da vključitev RDP v rehabilitacijski proces pomembno prispeva k zmanjševanju tveganja za padce in povečuje funkcionalno samostojnost pacientov. Za fizioterapevtsko stroko to pomeni prehod k bolj objektivni, na dokazih temelječi praksi, ki omogoča individualizirano obravnavo in natančno spremljanje terapevtskega napredka, kar dviguje standard kakovosti v nevrorehabilitaciji.
Keywords: ravnotežje, računalniška dinamična posturografija, fizioterapija, posturalna kontrola, rehabilitacija
Published in ReVIS: 01.07.2026; Views: 95; Downloads: 4
 Full text (890,17 KB) |
72. |
73. Popularization of archival sciences and archiving of classical and digital documents in theory and practicePeter Pavel Klasinc, 2025, professional article Keywords: arhivi, arhivistika, arhivska znanost, popularizacija, klasični dokumenti, digitalni dokumenti, arhivska praksa, izobraževanje arhivistov
Published in ReVIS: 01.07.2026; Views: 127; Downloads: 2
Full text (356,73 KB)
This document has many files! More... |
74. |
75. |
76. |
77. |
78. Slovenia dossier archive : archives between expertise, politics, and social memoryMatevž Košir, 2025, original scientific article Abstract: Purpose: The goal is to explore how political factors shaped the way archives in Slovenia were organized and operated throughout the 20th century.Method: The author employed a qualitative, historical-analytical method, draw-ing on archival records, historical literature, and archival theory to explore the intersection of politics and archival development in Slovenia.Results: The history of archives in Slovenia is not only a story of institutions and documents but also a multifaceted narrative of power, memory, vision, and societal evolution.Conclusions: The review of the history of Slovenian archives confirms the great importance of archival principles, particularly in connection with the Universal Declaration on Archives (2010). It highlights how adherence to these principles must guide the development, organization, and accessibility of archival institu-tions also in Slovenia, ensuring the preservation of documentary heritage and the promotion of transparency, accountability, and the right to information.
Published in ReVIS: 01.07.2026; Views: 118; Downloads: 2
Full text (329,88 KB)
This document has many files! More... |
79. Archaeological site archive – development of archaeological field documentationMirjam Jezeršek, 2025, review article Abstract: Purpose: The archaeological site archive consists of archaeological finds, sam-ples, and all documentation accompanying archaeological research and exca-vation or post-excavation processing. This documentation must be permanently stored as a collection in the relevant museum institution. Part of the documen-tation is also the archaeological field documentation, which is the subject of this research. The purpose of this article is to provide a systematic overview of the development and current state of archaeological field documentation and to identify current issues. What was the development of archaeological field docu-mentation and what types of documents did it contain, and does it contain?Methodology: The research uses a compilation/description method based on already established research and publications in this field.Findings: A review of literature has shown that Slovenian archaeologists only began to deal with archaeological field documentation in the late 1950s. Since the 1980s, the scope of fieldwork has increased significantly, and initiatives for the standardization of archaeological field documentation have begun to emerge. In 2013, the Rules on Archaeological Research were adopted, part of which is Annex 1: Professional Standards for Archaeological Field Research, which sets stand-ards for archaeological field documentation. Archaeologists have been aware and are still conscious of the problem of non-standardization of archaeological field documentation, which is also evident in its archiving.Conclusion: The standardization of archaeological field documentation is quite vague and does not contain precise and clear instructions, so the field remains rather undefined. Its status within the archive of an archaeological site in a mu-seum remains unclear
Keywords: Slovenian archaeology, archaeological site archive, archaeological field documentation, development, regulation
Published in ReVIS: 01.07.2026; Views: 113; Downloads: 3
Full text (343,62 KB)
This document has many files! More... |
80. Archaeological artefacts and their cataloguing: comparisons with archival practiceAnja Hellmuth Kramberger, Peter Pavel Klasinc, 2025, original scientific article Abstract: Purpose: Certain archaeological artefacts, depending on the definition of “what constitutes an archival document,” can be treated in accordance with the princi-ples of archival theory and practice. This article examines archaeological artefacts that bear inscriptions and are catalogued using archaeological methods and com-pares this approach with the cataloguing practices used for archival documents.Methodology: The article discusses appropriate cataloguing practices within archival science, i.e. how archival documents are recorded. A comparative meth-odology is thus proposed.Results: Through presentation and comparison, the article outlines cataloguing practices and identifies procedures that apply equally to the cataloguing of archae-ological artefacts and archival documents and highlights potential shared elements.Conclusions: The results of this research demonstrate the compatibility of cata-loguing archaeological artefacts and archival documents, opening new possibil-ities and outcomes in the context of digitization and the application of artificial intelligence.
Keywords: archaeological artefacts, archival documents, cataloguing, shared elements, comparison
Published in ReVIS: 01.07.2026; Views: 92; Downloads: 2
Full text (3,33 MB)
This document has many files! More... |
