Iskanje po repozitoriju

A+ | A- | | SLO | ENG

Opis: Magistrsko delo preučuje vpliv digitalizacije in novih tehnologij na postopke mediacije. Osredotoča se na pravne okvire, ki urejajo tako postopke mediacije kot spletne mediacije, spletne strani, ki ponujajo storitve mediacije, vlogo umetne inteligence in napovedi za razvoj spletne mediacije v prihodnosti. Primerjalno-pravni vidik vključuje štiri države: Slovenijo, Nemčijo, ZDA in Kitajsko. Delo temelji na kvalitativnih metodah. Uporabljene so bile metoda analize dokumentov in literature, metoda kompilacije, komparativna metoda, deduktivna metoda, primerjalno-pravna in analiza. Izvedena je bila analiza spletnih strani, ki ponujajo storitve spletne mediacije. Tako analiza zakonodaje kot analiza spletnih strani prinašata podobne ugotovitve, da je spletna mediacija v Nemčiji, ZDA in Kitajskem že razvita in razširjena, medtem ko Slovenija na tem področju sicer že kaže interes in razvoj, vendar zaenkrat še zaostaja. Analiza spletnih strani je pokazala, da večina spletnih strani izrecno navaja, da nudijo spletno mediacijo, a so informacije o pravni podlagi, temeljnih načelih in posledicah mediacije lahko pomanjkljive. Uporaba umetne inteligence pri mediaciji se ocenjuje kot pozitivna, saj lahko pospešuje postopek in zbira podatke, vendar pa se kaže ugotovitev, da je pomembno ohraniti človeški element v procesu mediacije. Magistrsko delo opozarja na pravne izzive, ki jih prinaša mediacija v digitalnem svetu, kot so varstvo osebnih podatkov, zaupnost in enakopravnost strank. Predlaga se, da bi se zakonodaja dopolnila s smernicami, ki bi urejale spletno mediacijo, tudi z namenom pospeševanja njene uporabe. Poudarek na izobraževanju mediatorjev na področju uporabe spletnih orodij bi lahko zagotovilo ohranitev kakovosti in učinkovitosti mediacije tudi v spletnem okolju.
Ključne besede: mediacija, spletna mediacija, digitalizacija, umetna inteligenca, pravni okvir, varstvo osebnih podatkov, zaupnost, Slovenija, Nemčija, ZDA, Kitajska
Objavljeno v ReVIS: 26.06.2025; Ogledov: 110; Prenosov: 3
Celotno besedilo (1,71 MB)

Opis: Th is chapter has demonstrated that peace has been the main legitimating source of European integration, which has entered the process of legitimisation as a factor of input, throughput and output legitimacy either momentarily (ad hoc) or on a permanent basis. To recall, 70 the input legitimacy consists of values that are set as a precondition for entering the integration process. They typically require certain qualities from the candidate states and their commitment to specific ideals that the integration shall personify. Th e throughput values are the values that guide the EU decision-making process lato sensu . Finally, the output values are the goals and objectives for which the EU has been created and which ought to be maximised to the greatest possible extent. All the symbolic, profoundly normative and value-laden declarations of the EU and its Member States confirm that peace is an enduring input and output legitimating factor of integration. From the very beginning peace has been a self-standing value to which all other values and achievements of the integration have been instrumental. In fact, even the future European federation, intimated in the Schuman declaration, is not a goal in and of itself; rather, it has been advanced as ‘ indispensable to the preservation of peace ’.A state that seeks admission to the EU has to be peace-loving. Peace is considered as just peace, whose content is determined with reference to fundamental values of the EU, which are ‘ part of our soul, part of what defines us today ’. Just peace defined through Article 2 TEU, to only slightly paraphrase the CJEU, makes up the ’very identity of the European Union as a common legal order’. As such, its value is inexhaustible, 75 while its relevance hinges on the real and perceived threat to peace. The war in Ukraine presents more than a credible threat to the internal peace in the EU and it certainly signifies a total absence of peace in external terms, both under its subjective and objective conception. Th e normative relevance of the value of peace in the EU today is at an all-time high and it can be expected, even if for purely utilitarian reasons, that it will provide a significant boost to the process of European integration, in its widening and deepening leg alike. Provided, of course, that Ukraine prevails. In the opposite scenario, not only just peace in the EU, but its very survival, might be at stake. It is for that reason that the strategy of achieving peace in the EU and beyond has undergone a complete transformation from economic, political and legal peace building mechanisms to the more recent explicit investment in the military capacity of the EU and its Member States. Peace continues to remain an enduring source of legitimisation of European integration, but the means of achieving it have been altered beyond imagination.
Objavljeno v ReVIS: 26.06.2025; Ogledov: 118; Prenosov: 1
Celotno besedilo (708,99 KB)

Opis: What is a real character of judicial (self)-government in Slovenia? Does it live up to the standards established in a well-ordered society, based on the established rule of law and consolidated democracy? This certainly is an impression that an external critical, but uniformed, observer develops when he or she approaches the legal regulation of judicial (self)-government in Slovenia. This also is an impression that has been perpetuated in academic and professional circles prior and after the enlargement of the EU. The article dispels this myth. It does so by providing a comprehensive assessment of all the bodies and processes involved in the judicial (self)-government in Slovenia. Contrary to the prevalent formalistic legal approach, which dominates the legal scholarship concerned with judicial governance and the courts more generally, the article relies on a socio-legal methodological approach. It therefore situates the system of judicial self-government in the Slovenian socio-political context in order to provide an insight into how the judicial self-government really works and to what an extent it falls short of the normative ideals prescribed by the Slovenian positive law.
Objavljeno v ReVIS: 24.06.2025; Ogledov: 125; Prenosov: 1
Celotno besedilo (408,44 KB)

Opis: Drawing borders between countries has historically been a very demanding task, often underpinned by deeply-rooted emotions that suppress the argumentative dialogue and reasoning and in too many cases has led to long-term general deterioration of relationships which may devolve into war. As the title suggests, the focal point of this paper will be a legal assessment or a legal prediction of the outcome of the maritime border delimitation dispute between Slovenia and Croatia in the northernmost part of the Adriatic Sea, namely in the Piran Bay. The paper will be structured into four parts. In the first part the authors will present the factual context of the dispute, followed by a presentation of the legal arguments that both countries have laid on the table so far. In the third hermeneutical part, these legal arguments will be applied to the factual context assessed in light of valid international law and especially the existing jurisprudence on international juridical and non-juridical bodies, including the practice of other states in similar cases. In the last part the authors will predict the outcome of the case as if they were the arbitrators or the judges of a tribunal to whom the dispute between Slovenia and Croatia will most likely eventually be referred to.
Ključne besede: arbitraža, mednarodno pravo, morske meje, pomorsko pravo, Slovenija, Hrvaška
Objavljeno v ReVIS: 24.06.2025; Ogledov: 137; Prenosov: 1
Celotno besedilo (761,73 KB)

Opis: Since the very conception of the European integration, there has been one core question that has attracted much attention and yet it remains contested and in a way unanswered till present. What is the legal nature of the European integration - a query about what integration stands for (the descriptive dimension), how it is to be explained and construed (the explanatory dimension) and eventually what it should stand for (the normative dimension). With the lapse of time, and as integration has evolved, various legal, political, economical and even broader intellectual streams of mutually shared beliefs, we should call them narratives, have emerged all offering their own and separate visions of what constitutes the most appropriate answer. Among them, however, the constitutional narrative has come out as a sort of master or dominant narrative whose answers have reached and persuaded the widest circle of influential stakeholders with the greatest impact on the social construction of the European integration.
Objavljeno v ReVIS: 24.06.2025; Ogledov: 126; Prenosov: 1
Celotno besedilo (537,34 KB)