Repozitorij samostojnih visokošolskih in višješolskih izobraževalnih organizacij

Iskanje po repozitoriju
A+ | A- | Pomoč | SLO | ENG

Iskalni niz: išči po
išči po
išči po
išči po

Možnosti:
  Ponastavi


11 - 20 / 2129
Na začetekNa prejšnjo stran12345678910Na naslednjo stranNa konec
11.
Analiza tehnik elektronskega javnega naročanja za spodbujanje konkurenčnosti : magistrsko delo
Miha Primec, 2025, magistrsko delo

Opis: Elektronsko javno naročanje je bilo s sprejemom pete generacije direktiv EU na področju javnega naročanja zasnovano kot eden ključnih mehanizmov, ki omogoča večjo transparentnost in enakopravnost med ponudniki (gospodarskimi subjekti), kar posledično spodbuja konkurenčnost in izboljšuje kakovost storitev ter znižuje stroške javnih naročnikov. Dosledno spoštovanje temeljnih načel javnonaročniške zakonodaje, kot so načelo gospodarnosti, učinkovitosti, transparentnosti in zagotavljanja konkurenčnosti, preprečuje morebitne zlorabe sistema in zagotavlja potrebno pravičnost v postopkih javnega naročanja. Magistrsko delo se osredotoča na obravnavo tehnik javnega naročanja zlasti na okvirne sporazume in dinamični nabavni sistem z vidika načela zagotavljanja konkurence med ponudniki. V magistrskem delu je analiziran zakonodajni okvir, ki ureja elektronske tehnike javnega naročanja ter analizo uporabe le-teh v praksi. Osrednji del magistrskega dela je prikaz razmejitve med različnimi tehnikami elektronskega javnega naročanja in analiza vpliva uporabe teh tehnik na konkurenčnost. Slednje je ključno za doseganje najboljših rezultatov v javnem naročanju in za zagotavljanje, da so javna sredstva porabljena učinkovito in gospodarno. V okviru preveritve raziskovalnih vprašanj in odgovorov so uporabljene zlasti naslednje znanstvenoraziskovalne metode: deskriptivna metoda, metoda kompilacije, metoda komparacije kot tudi metoda analize in sinteze. Elektronsko javno naročanje prispeva k večji konkurenčnosti med ponudniki v postopkih javnega naročanja. Z raziskavo je bilo tudi ugotovljeno, da je dinamični nabavni sistem zaradi svoje fleksibilnosti in možnosti sprotnega vključevanja novih ponudnikov bolj učinkovit pri spodbujanju konkurenčnosti kot tradicionalni okvirni sporazumi. Okvirni sporazumi predstavljajo učinkovito orodje za vzpostavljanje dolgoročnih poslovnih odnosov med naročniki in ponudniki, vendar se pojavlja omejevanje konkurence zlasti zaradi nemožnosti vključevanja novih ponudnikov v času trajanja okvirnih sporazumov. Nasprotno, dinamični nabavni sistemi omogočajo vključevanje novih ponudnikov v postopek ves čas trajanja dinamičnega nabavnega sistema, kar povečuje možnosti za pridobitev konkurenčnih ponudb in prilagodljivost na trgu.
Ključne besede: naročnik, elektronsko javno naročanje, javno naročilo, ponudnik, konkurenčnost, okvirni sporazumi, dinamični nabavni sistem
Objavljeno v ReVIS: 26.06.2025; Ogledov: 135; Prenosov: 1
.pdf Celotno besedilo (1,52 MB)

12.
Vpliv digitalizacije in novih tehnologij na mediacijo : magistrsko delo
Marša Jekovec, 2025, magistrsko delo

Opis: Magistrsko delo preučuje vpliv digitalizacije in novih tehnologij na postopke mediacije. Osredotoča se na pravne okvire, ki urejajo tako postopke mediacije kot spletne mediacije, spletne strani, ki ponujajo storitve mediacije, vlogo umetne inteligence in napovedi za razvoj spletne mediacije v prihodnosti. Primerjalno-pravni vidik vključuje štiri države: Slovenijo, Nemčijo, ZDA in Kitajsko. Delo temelji na kvalitativnih metodah. Uporabljene so bile metoda analize dokumentov in literature, metoda kompilacije, komparativna metoda, deduktivna metoda, primerjalno-pravna in analiza. Izvedena je bila analiza spletnih strani, ki ponujajo storitve spletne mediacije. Tako analiza zakonodaje kot analiza spletnih strani prinašata podobne ugotovitve, da je spletna mediacija v Nemčiji, ZDA in Kitajskem že razvita in razširjena, medtem ko Slovenija na tem področju sicer že kaže interes in razvoj, vendar zaenkrat še zaostaja. Analiza spletnih strani je pokazala, da večina spletnih strani izrecno navaja, da nudijo spletno mediacijo, a so informacije o pravni podlagi, temeljnih načelih in posledicah mediacije lahko pomanjkljive. Uporaba umetne inteligence pri mediaciji se ocenjuje kot pozitivna, saj lahko pospešuje postopek in zbira podatke, vendar pa se kaže ugotovitev, da je pomembno ohraniti človeški element v procesu mediacije. Magistrsko delo opozarja na pravne izzive, ki jih prinaša mediacija v digitalnem svetu, kot so varstvo osebnih podatkov, zaupnost in enakopravnost strank. Predlaga se, da bi se zakonodaja dopolnila s smernicami, ki bi urejale spletno mediacijo, tudi z namenom pospeševanja njene uporabe. Poudarek na izobraževanju mediatorjev na področju uporabe spletnih orodij bi lahko zagotovilo ohranitev kakovosti in učinkovitosti mediacije tudi v spletnem okolju.
Ključne besede: mediacija, spletna mediacija, digitalizacija, umetna inteligenca, pravni okvir, varstvo osebnih podatkov, zaupnost, Slovenija, Nemčija, ZDA, Kitajska
Objavljeno v ReVIS: 26.06.2025; Ogledov: 110; Prenosov: 3
.pdf Celotno besedilo (1,71 MB)

13.
Pravne posledice neupoštevanja etike in integritete Volkswagna : magistrsko delo
Klemen Lajovic, 2025, magistrsko delo

Opis: Upoštevanje etike in integritete je ključno za uspešno delovanje podjetja. Ne gre zgolj za besede na papirju, temveč za dolžnost spoštovanja vseh smernic, ki so napisane. Posledice, do katerih privede njihovo nespoštovanje, se kažejo v finančnih kaznih podjetja, izgubi zaupanja s strani potrošnika in kazenski odgovornosti vseh vpletenih. Podjetje Volkswagen je eden izmed največjih proizvajalcev vozil na svetu, z več milijoni zaposlenih. Deluje v skladu z nacionalnimi zakonodajami kot tudi z lastnimi smernicami etike in integritete, za katere se pričakuje, da jim sledijo vsi zaposleni znotraj podjetja Volkswagen. Vzrok afere Dieselgate je iskati v želji po finančnih koristih in neupoštevanju pravil etike in integritete. V nasprotju s pričakovanji vodstva podjetja Volkswagen, ki je za nečednosti vedelo, so nepravilnosti razkrili tudi organi v Združenih državah Amerike. Zaradi pritiska ameriških oblasti kot tudi vse svetovne javnosti se je Volkswagen zlomil ter priznal goljufijo z odklopnimi napravami pri izpustih emisij v ozračje. V vodstvu so priznali poslovno goljufijo ter zavajanje potrošnikov, a s tem priznanjempodjetje ni rešilo vseh težav. V zadnjih letih so se zvrstili številni sodni postopki proti vodstvu podjetja, pojavile so setudi kolektivne tožbe po vsem svetu. Afera Dieselgate, ki je nastala zaradi neupoštevanja in nespoštovanja lastne etike in integritete, tako rezultira v največjem svetovnem škandalu v avtomobilski industriji v vsej svoji zgodovini.
Ključne besede: etika, integriteta, afera Dieselgate, poslovna goljufija, kazenska odgovornost, kolektivne tožbe
Objavljeno v ReVIS: 26.06.2025; Ogledov: 105; Prenosov: 3
.pdf Celotno besedilo (538,50 KB)

14.
The enduring legitimisation of European integration by reference to peace? : High-level Conference on The Impact of War (in Ukraine) on the EU, 27. 3. - 28. 3. 2023, Verversdijk, European Legal Studies Department of the College of Europe, Bruges.
Matej Avbelj, 2023, vabljeno predavanje na konferenci brez natisa

Opis: Th is chapter has demonstrated that peace has been the main legitimating source of European integration, which has entered the process of legitimisation as a factor of input, throughput and output legitimacy either momentarily (ad hoc) or on a permanent basis. To recall, 70 the input legitimacy consists of values that are set as a precondition for entering the integration process. They typically require certain qualities from the candidate states and their commitment to specific ideals that the integration shall personify. Th e throughput values are the values that guide the EU decision-making process lato sensu . Finally, the output values are the goals and objectives for which the EU has been created and which ought to be maximised to the greatest possible extent. All the symbolic, profoundly normative and value-laden declarations of the EU and its Member States confirm that peace is an enduring input and output legitimating factor of integration. From the very beginning peace has been a self-standing value to which all other values and achievements of the integration have been instrumental. In fact, even the future European federation, intimated in the Schuman declaration, is not a goal in and of itself; rather, it has been advanced as ‘ indispensable to the preservation of peace ’.A state that seeks admission to the EU has to be peace-loving. Peace is considered as just peace, whose content is determined with reference to fundamental values of the EU, which are ‘ part of our soul, part of what defines us today ’. Just peace defined through Article 2 TEU, to only slightly paraphrase the CJEU, makes up the ’very identity of the European Union as a common legal order’. As such, its value is inexhaustible, 75 while its relevance hinges on the real and perceived threat to peace. The war in Ukraine presents more than a credible threat to the internal peace in the EU and it certainly signifies a total absence of peace in external terms, both under its subjective and objective conception. Th e normative relevance of the value of peace in the EU today is at an all-time high and it can be expected, even if for purely utilitarian reasons, that it will provide a significant boost to the process of European integration, in its widening and deepening leg alike. Provided, of course, that Ukraine prevails. In the opposite scenario, not only just peace in the EU, but its very survival, might be at stake. It is for that reason that the strategy of achieving peace in the EU and beyond has undergone a complete transformation from economic, political and legal peace building mechanisms to the more recent explicit investment in the military capacity of the EU and its Member States. Peace continues to remain an enduring source of legitimisation of European integration, but the means of achieving it have been altered beyond imagination.
Objavljeno v ReVIS: 26.06.2025; Ogledov: 118; Prenosov: 1
.pdf Celotno besedilo (708,99 KB)

15.
Integral Pre-emption of EU Democracy in Economic Crisis under Transnational Law
Matej Avbelj, 2015, izvirni znanstveni članek

Opis: This article examines the challenges of transnational law for democracy in the European Union in times of economic crisis. The concept of democracy is fleshed out first. This is followed by a two-pronged study of the internal and external democracy-affecting processes, taken separately as well as jointly, and of their impact on democracy in the European Union. Finally, some normative proposals, embedded in the theory of legal pluralism, to improve the state of European Union democracy in the present unfavourable internal and transnational environment are offered in the conclusion
Ključne besede: European Union, democracy, economis crisis, transnational law, legal pluralism
Objavljeno v ReVIS: 26.06.2025; Ogledov: 129; Prenosov: 1
.pdf Celotno besedilo (217,19 KB)

16.
Contextual Analysis of Judicial Governance in Slovenia
Matej Avbelj, 2018, izvirni znanstveni članek

Opis: What is a real character of judicial (self)-government in Slovenia? Does it live up to the standards established in a well-ordered society, based on the established rule of law and consolidated democracy? This certainly is an impression that an external critical, but uniformed, observer develops when he or she approaches the legal regulation of judicial (self)-government in Slovenia. This also is an impression that has been perpetuated in academic and professional circles prior and after the enlargement of the EU. The article dispels this myth. It does so by providing a comprehensive assessment of all the bodies and processes involved in the judicial (self)-government in Slovenia. Contrary to the prevalent formalistic legal approach, which dominates the legal scholarship concerned with judicial governance and the courts more generally, the article relies on a socio-legal methodological approach. It therefore situates the system of judicial self-government in the Slovenian socio-political context in order to provide an insight into how the judicial self-government really works and to what an extent it falls short of the normative ideals prescribed by the Slovenian positive law.
Objavljeno v ReVIS: 24.06.2025; Ogledov: 125; Prenosov: 1
.pdf Celotno besedilo (408,44 KB)

17.
The EU and the many faces of legal pluralism toward a coherent or uniform EU legal order?
Matej Avbelj, 2006, izvirni znanstveni članek

Opis: In the last decade or so, legal academia has witnessed a literal explosion of discourse of legal pluralism. Far from being an exception here, the field of EU law is at the forefront.1 In this paper we will try to explain briefly what the reasons for this are, and above all what legal pluralism, in its various forms, actually stands for. For this purpose, we will compare the so-called classical conceptions of legal pluralism on the one hand, and legal pluralism as it has emerged in the European Union on the other hand. It will be argued that the classical conceptions of legal pluralism fall short of explaining, and are conceptually different from, the legal pluralism that has been taking root within the EU. Having understood this difference, we will then focus more precisely - and this will constitute the core of the paper - on the European Union and the pluralist challenges that ensue from the uneasy and complex relationships between the legal orders of the Member States and the supranational legal order. The core question in that regard is how to approach the challenges that EU legal pluralism in its various forms and degrees poses for the role that the law is expected to play in the European Union. It will be claimed that the two different responses to this question are: either by preserving EU legal pluralism or by thwarting it, namely, by conceptualising and developing the EU legal order as a coherent or as a uniform legal order. Finally, it will be argued that since each of these two models seems to presume a different image of the European Union, the choice between the two depends on which should better ensure certainty in the allocation of rights and duties that best fits the conception of justice prevailing in the EU.
Objavljeno v ReVIS: 24.06.2025; Ogledov: 146; Prenosov: 1
.pdf Celotno besedilo (96,76 KB)

18.
The conundrum of the Piran Bay : Slovenia v. Croatia - the case of maritime delimitation
Matej Avbelj, Jernej Letnar Černič, 2007, izvirni znanstveni članek

Opis: Drawing borders between countries has historically been a very demanding task, often underpinned by deeply-rooted emotions that suppress the argumentative dialogue and reasoning and in too many cases has led to long-term general deterioration of relationships which may devolve into war. As the title suggests, the focal point of this paper will be a legal assessment or a legal prediction of the outcome of the maritime border delimitation dispute between Slovenia and Croatia in the northernmost part of the Adriatic Sea, namely in the Piran Bay. The paper will be structured into four parts. In the first part the authors will present the factual context of the dispute, followed by a presentation of the legal arguments that both countries have laid on the table so far. In the third hermeneutical part, these legal arguments will be applied to the factual context assessed in light of valid international law and especially the existing jurisprudence on international juridical and non-juridical bodies, including the practice of other states in similar cases. In the last part the authors will predict the outcome of the case as if they were the arbitrators or the judges of a tribunal to whom the dispute between Slovenia and Croatia will most likely eventually be referred to.
Ključne besede: arbitraža, mednarodno pravo, morske meje, pomorsko pravo, Slovenija, Hrvaška
Objavljeno v ReVIS: 24.06.2025; Ogledov: 137; Prenosov: 1
.pdf Celotno besedilo (761,73 KB)

19.
Ustavni monizem in krčenje referendumskega odločanja - kritična analiza doktrine zlorabe referenduma
Matej Avbelj, 2005, izvirni znanstveni članek

Opis: Namen tega prispevka je opozoriti na pravno-tehnične šibkosti argumentacije slovenskega ustavnega sodišča pri t. i. doktrini zlorabe referenduma. Očitno je ustavno sodišče v preveliki vnemi uresničiti svojo odločbo prekoračilo ustavne okvire sistema delitve oblasti in tako spodkopalo razmerja med ustavnimi akterji v sistemu zavor in ravnovesij. "Policy" analiza namreč pokaže, da se je tehtnica pri tem nagnila preveč v smer vsakokratne parlamentarne večine, ki sedaj lahko laže odstrani ovire na poti do uresničitve svojih političnih interesov. Slednje lahko na dolgi rok, in nekatera znamenja kažejo na to že sedaj, privede do ustavnega monizma, ki je nasprotje ustavnega pluralizma, v katerem raznoliki politični in drugi interesi tekmujejo med seboj po pravilih političnega diskurza, utemeljenega na priznavanju enakih diskusijskih možnosti in na pripravljenosti za sklepanje kompromisov, utemeljenih na načelih solidarnosti in ustavne strpnosti. Vloga instituta referenduma kot pravice veta, oz. zavore za ustvarjanje ravnovesja, je izjemnega pomena, zato ustavno sodišče odločanja o njegovem omejevanju ne bi smelo puščati v rokah političnega diskurza in tekmujočih političnih sil, ampak bi moralo zanj poskrbeti samo v skladu s pravili pravnega diskurza, ki jih narekuje obstoječi slovenski ustavni red.
Ključne besede: ustavno pravo, referendumi
Objavljeno v ReVIS: 24.06.2025; Ogledov: 98; Prenosov: 1
.pdf Celotno besedilo (448,39 KB)

20.
Questioning EU constitutionalisms
Matej Avbelj, 2008, izvirni znanstveni članek

Opis: Since the very conception of the European integration, there has been one core question that has attracted much attention and yet it remains contested and in a way unanswered till present. What is the legal nature of the European integration - a query about what integration stands for (the descriptive dimension), how it is to be explained and construed (the explanatory dimension) and eventually what it should stand for (the normative dimension). With the lapse of time, and as integration has evolved, various legal, political, economical and even broader intellectual streams of mutually shared beliefs, we should call them narratives, have emerged all offering their own and separate visions of what constitutes the most appropriate answer. Among them, however, the constitutional narrative has come out as a sort of master or dominant narrative whose answers have reached and persuaded the widest circle of influential stakeholders with the greatest impact on the social construction of the European integration.
Objavljeno v ReVIS: 24.06.2025; Ogledov: 126; Prenosov: 1
.pdf Celotno besedilo (537,34 KB)

Iskanje izvedeno v 0.61 sek.
Na vrh