Repository of colleges and higher education institutions

Show document
A+ | A- | Help | SLO | ENG

Title:Učinkovitost upravno - sodnega varstva strank v postopkih javnih razpisov
Authors:ID Zupin, Urška (Author)
ID Jazbec, Milan (Mentor) More about this mentor... New window
Files:.pdf RAZ_Zupin_Urska_i2019.pdf (1,25 MB)
MD5: E2A3C0813F6F32E881B77FDA677BD637
 
Language:Slovenian
Work type:Master's thesis/paper
Typology:2.09 - Master's Thesis
Organization:EVRO-PF - Nova Univerza - European Faculty of Law
Abstract:Postopek javnega razpisa je v slovenski zakonodaji opredeljen kot postopek, ki upravnim organom omogoča zakonito podeljevanje subvencij oziroma javnih sredstev. Po teoriji sodi gre za področje gospodarskega prava, namenjeno pa je usmerjanju delovanja gospodarskih subjektov v smeri doseganja strateških politik države, kjer trg ne deluje (v zadostni meri). A dejanski obseg je širši. V praksi gre za dodeljevanje subvencij za razvojno dejavnost (podjetja, javne organizacije), za ohranjanje jezika in kulture (fizične osebe, pravne osebe, zavodi), subvencij, ki zagotavljajo samooskrbo in ohranjanje podeželja (kmeti) in še veliko več. Zakonit cilj razdeljevanja javnih sredstev zasebnim subjektom mora vedno slediti javnemu interesu. Ta se zagotavlja z izbiro vsebine, ki je v javnem interesu in tudi z zakonito izvedbo postopkov. Nadzor v upravnem postopku izvajajo organi druge stopnje, v okviru sodnega nadzora pa Upravna sodišča. Ker praksa kaže, da je v primeru te posebne vrste upravnih postopkov sodni nadzor edini, ki je na voljo, je učinkovitost te vrste nadzora nad delovanjem upravnih organov izrednega pomena. Učinkovitost sodnega varstva je odvisna od vrste in obsega sodnega nadzora ter pooblastil, ki jih imajo v zvezi z nadzorom tovrstnih aktov sodišča na voljo. Razloga za pomembnost učinkovitosti nadzora sta vsaj dva. Prvi je da gre pogosto za edino razpoložljivo pravno sredstvo, drugi pa da gre za edino obliko nadzora zasledovanja javnega interesa. Obseg sredstev, ki se na ta način iz javnih sredstev prenesejo na zasebne subjekte, pa zasebni interes po učinkovitem upravno-sodnem varstvu spremeni v interes vseh, ki ta sredstva preko davkov in dajatev vplačujemo v proračun.
Place of publishing:Ljubljana
Place of performance:Ljubljana
Publisher:[U. Zupin]
Year of publishing:2019
Year of performance:2019
Number of pages:96 str.
PID:20.500.12556/ReVIS-6220 New window
COBISS.SI-ID:2048034276 New window
UDC:342(043.2)
Note:Mag. delo 2. stopnje bolonjskega študija; Nasl. z nasl. zaslona; Opis vira z dne 2. 12. 2019;
Publication date in ReVIS:03.12.2019
Views:2216
Downloads:168
Metadata:XML DC-XML DC-RDF
:
Copy citation
  
Share:Bookmark and Share


Hover the mouse pointer over a document title to show the abstract or click on the title to get all document metadata.

Secondary language

Language:English
Abstract:The public tender is the main formal procedure in Slovenian legislation that allows public authorities to legally give out subsidies. They fall in to the field of company law. Its main goal is steering companies in the direction of countries strategic policies in the fields where free market is not working in sufficient extent. But the real extent of subsidies is wider. In practice it can be subsidies for research and development (companies and public organizations), maintaining Slovenian language and culture (individuals, legal entities, institutes), subsidies given to farmers with the intent to better the self-sufficiency and maintaining the countryside. The legal goal is following the public interest. Following public interest is secured by the subject of the call and on the other hand with the legality of the procedures. The legal control is executed by the second instance authority and by the Administrative courts. As in practice judicial review is often the only remedy available the efficiency of it is crucial. This efficiency is dependent on the extent of judicial review and the remedies that are empowered to the court in this specific cases. There are at least two reasons for the importance of efficient judicial control. Firstly, in most instances it the only legal remedy and secondly it is the only legal review of the efficiency of following the public interest. The extent of the funds allocated to private subjects in this way changes the private interest of an efficient judicial control in to the interest of each tax payer.
Keywords:Javno pravo


Back