Repository of colleges and higher education institutions

Show document
A+ | A- | Help | SLO | ENG

Title:Pravica do zasebnosti pri prikritih preiskovalnih ukrepih policije : diplomsko delo
Authors:ID Fuks, Nastja (Author)
ID Mavčič, Arne (Mentor) More about this mentor... New window
Files: This document has no files. This document may have a physical copy in the library of the organization, check the status via COBISS. Link is opened in a new window
Language:Slovenian
Work type:Final reflection paper
Typology:2.11 - Undergraduate Thesis
Organization:EVRO-PF - Nova Univerza - European Faculty of Law
Abstract:Pravica do zasebnosti je ena izmed osebnostnih pravic, urejenih v 35. členu Ustave Republike Slovenije. Kot temeljna človekova pravica uživa ustavno varstvo, zavarovana pa je tudi z nacionalnimi in mednarodnimi institucijami oziroma akti. Posameznika varuje pred vsakršnimi posegi državne oblasti in javnosti v njegovo življenje. Govorimo o delu človekovega obstoja, ki mora zavoljo pravilnega razvoja posameznikove osebnosti in ohranitve duševnega miru ostati zunaj sfere družbenega nadzora. Ima absolutni značaj, kar pomeni, da učinkuje zoper vsakogar (erga omnes), ki bi neupravičeno posegel vanjo. Hiter razvoj tehnologije, ki je značilen za sodobno družbo, pa uvaja bolj ali manj izdelane oblike nadzorovanja, s katerimi je mogoče slikovno in zvočno opazovati tako širšo javnost kot posameznike. Policija kot državni organ, ki preiskuje kriminalna dejanja in uporablja omenjena sredstva, ima tako na voljo prikrite preiskovalne ukrepe za odkrivanje vseh oblik kriminala. Najpomembnejši značilnosti prikritih preiskovalnih ukrepov sta tajnost izvajanja in močan poseg v človekove pravice in temeljne svoboščine ter s tem tudi v ustavno pravico do zasebnosti. Prikriti preiskovalni ukrepi veljajo za tista policijska pooblastila, ki najgloblje in najintenzivneje posegajo v človekovo pravico do zasebnosti, zaradi česar je dopustnost takšnega posega izključno odvisna od presoje posameznega sodišča.
Keywords:pravica do zasebnosti, varstvo zasebnosti, prikriti preiskovalni ukrepi, predkazenski postopek, policija
Place of publishing:Nova Gorica
Place of performance:Nova Gorica
Publisher:[N. Fuks]
Year of publishing:2021
Year of performance:2021
Number of pages:85 str.
PID:20.500.12556/ReVIS-7800 New window
COBISS.SI-ID:69481219 New window
UDC:342.7:351.746.2 (043.2)
Note:Dipl. delo 1. stopnje bolonjskega študija;
Publication date in ReVIS:07.07.2021
Views:2185
Downloads:0
Metadata:XML DC-XML DC-RDF
:
Copy citation
  
Share:Bookmark and Share


Hover the mouse pointer over a document title to show the abstract or click on the title to get all document metadata.

Secondary language

Language:English
Abstract:The right for privacy is one of the personal rights, regulated under Article 35 of the Constitution of the Republic of Slovenia. As a fundamental human right, it enjoys constitutional protection, but is also protected with national and international institutions or acts. It protects the individual against any interventions by the State authority or public into his life. We are talking about a part of human existence, which needs to stay outside of the sphere of social control for the proper development of the individual%s personality and to maintain peace of mind. It is absolute, meaning that it has an effect on everyone (erga omnes), who would unjustifiably interfere with it. Rapid development of technology, typical for modern society, on the other hand introduces more or less structured forms of control, which enable video and audio observation of the wider public or individuals. The Police as a State authority, which investigates criminal acts and uses the mentioned measures, thus has covert investigative measures at its disposal in order to uncover all types of crime. The most important characteristics of covert investigative measures are implementation secrecy and strong interference with human rights and fundamental freedoms and thus with the constitutional right for privacy. Covert investigative measures are considered as those police powers, which most deeply and most intensely interfere with the human right for privacy, which is why the admissibility of such interventions depends solely on the judgement of individual courts.


Back