Show document

A+ | A- | | SLO | ENG

Title: Vpliv stila navezanosti na razumevanje osebne svobode : diplomska naloga Authors: ID Kraljevič, Kaja (Author) ID Mlakar, Janez (Mentor) More about this mentor... Files: UNI_Kraljevic_Kaja_i2016.pdf (1021,69 KB) MD5: A8953C10964D28EB55A2978ECC5BF6DC   Language: Slovenian Work type: Undergraduate thesis Typology: 2.11 - Undergraduate Thesis Organization: FUDS - School of advanced social studies Abstract: V diplomski nalogi obravnavam povezavo med razumevanjem osebne svobode in oblikovanimi stili navezanosti v primarni družini ter kasneje v partnerskem odnosu. Posebej sem se posvetila partnerskemu odnosu in izbiri partnerja. Izhajala sem iz dejstva, da stil navezanosti, ki ga oseba oblikuje v otroštvu vpliva tudi na razumevanje svobode. Pri svojih intervjuvancih sem skušala najprej ugotoviti, kako so v primarni družini razumeli pojem osebne svobode, nato sem to povezala s stilom navezanosti, ki ga je sogovornik oblikoval. Zanimalo me je, kakšno sporočilo o svobodi izhaja iz različnih stilov navezanosti. V nadaljevanju sem raziskovala, ali so sogovorniki stil navezanosti prenesli tudi v svoj partnerski odnos, oziroma ali so si izbrali partnerja, ki jim je omogočil nadaljevanje prvotnega stila navezanosti. Moja kvalitativna raziskava črpa izhodišča iz teorije navezanosti Johna Bowlbyja in Mary Ainsworth. V vprašanjih za polstrukturiran intervju pa sem skušala zajeti temeljne potrebe, ki naj bi jih posameznik zadovoljil v družini, kot jih navaja Gabi Čačinovič-Vogrinčič. Opravila sem štiri poglobljene polstrukturirane intervjuje, s tremi ženskami in enim moškim. Hipoteze sem preverjala s pomočjo opisov stilov navezanosti Johna Bowlbyja in Mary Ainsworth ter Intervjuja navezanosti v odraslosti. Zavedam se, da je pojem svobode zelo kompleksen, vendar sem v kontekstu diplomske naloge iskala predvsem morebitne dejavnike psihičnega ali celo fizičnega nasilja v odnosih. Prav tako sem preverjala prisotnost fleksibilnih ali nefleksibilnih prepričanj, prisotnost sprejemanja in spoštovanja. Rezultati so pokazali, da se stili navezanosti iz otroštva v večini primerov prenesejo tudi v partnerski odnos, kar pomeni, da so si intervjuvanci izbrali partnerja, ki jim je tak stil omogočil. Odgovori so še pokazali, da so sogovorniki v partnerskem odnosu navadno zadovoljili enake potrebe kot v primarni družini. Ker sem pri vsakem odgovoru skušala oceniti tudi prisotnost »svobode«, sem pričakovano prišla do ugotovitve, da je bil v varno navezanih družinah, pojem osebne svobode neprimerno bolj prisoten kot pri ostalih. Te družine so izkazovale več strpnosti, spoštovanja, člani družine so si bolj zaupali in večkrat so med seboj podelili čustva. Keywords: družina, partnerstvo, osebna svoboda, stili navezanosti, ljubezen, diplomske naloge Place of publishing: Ljubljana Place of performance: Ljubljana Publisher: [K. Kraljevič] Year of publishing: 2016 Year of performance: 2016 Number of pages: 91 str., [116] str. pril. PID: 20.500.12556/ReVIS-7999  COBISS.SI-ID: 4607739  UDC: 159.9 Publication date in ReVIS: 28.07.2021 Views: 1297 Downloads: 83 Metadata:    Cite this work Plain text BibTeX EndNote XML EndNote/Refer RIS ABNT ACM Ref AMA APA Chicago 17th Author-Date Harvard IEEE ISO 690 MLA Vancouver : Copy citation

Share: Hover the mouse pointer over a document title to show the abstract or click on the title to get all document metadata.

Secondary language

Language:

English

Abstract:

Theme of my thesis is the connection between the understanding of personal freedom and developed attachment stylein the primary family and in next close relationships. Special attention was dedicated close relationship and choosing of the partner. Starting point of discussion was the fact that the attachment style developed by individual in childhood also influences understanding of the freedom. Therefore was my primary concern to establish how the interviewed persons understood personal freedom in the primary family and to what degree was this understanding present at all. Those findings were then connected with style of attachment developed by the person. I was interested in the message of freedom, expressed by different attachment style. My qualitative research is based in theory of attachment by John Bowlby and Mary Ainsworth. In questionnaire for semistructured interview I’ve tried to include those basic needs of individual, that could be satisfied in family, as they are quoted by Gabi Čačinovič - Vogrinčič. I have done four deep semistructured interviews with 3 women and 1 man. Hypotesis was verified with definitions of attachment styles by John Bowlby and Mary Ainsworth and with Interview of attachments in adulthood. I am aware, that the freedom had very complex meaning, so I was in the context of my thesis predominantly searching for possible factors of psychological of physical violence in relationships. Presence of flexible or inflexible beliefs, presence of acceptance and respect was also checked. Results show that childhood attachment styles are mostly transfered into a close relationship, which means, that interviewed persons have chosen partner, who made this possible. Answers also showed, that interviewed persons usually fulfilled same needs in close relationship as in the primary family. Based on their answers I determined what kind of attachment is involved and their corresponding adult versions. Since I’ve tried to evaluate in each answer presence of “the freedom”, i came expectantly to conclusion, that the notion of freedom in the securely attached families was far more present then in the rest. The basic need were fulfilled as well. Those families expressed more tolerance and respect. Members of those families showed higher level of trust and more often shared their emotions.

Back