Repository of colleges and higher education institutions

Show document
A+ | A- | Help | SLO | ENG

Title:Diverging and converging perspectives: Exploring the leadership of informal learning in knowledge work
Authors:ID Vuorio, Oona (Author)
ID Reiman, Arto (Author)
ID Kekkonen, Päivi (Author)
ID Lampela, Hannele (Author)
Files:URL https://toknowpress.net/submission/index.php/ijmkl/article/download/216/146
 
URL https://toknowpress.net/submission/index.php/ijmkl/article/download/216/146
 
.pdf RAZ_Vuorio_Oona_0.pdf (565,97 KB)
MD5: 331DA198BDD489365380D30F811775C8
 
Language:English
Work type:Article
Typology:1.01 - Original Scientific Article
Organization:MFDPŠ - International School for Social and Business Studies
Abstract:Purpose: This study examines how experiences of informal learning and its management diverge and converge across organizational levels in a knowledge-intensive organization. The study bridges a gap in comparative perspectives concerning informal learning leadership by examining managerial and employee points of view. Study design/methodology/approach: The study employed a qualitative, cross-sectional case study design with 18 semi-structured interviews with managers and employees from within a multinational IT and consulting organization.  Data analysis was conducted by an inductive thematic analysis, enabling the emergence of themes related to informal learning, learning modalities, leadership engagement and organizational support structures. Findings: The findings indicate a consensus among managers and employees that informal learning is important, but there is significant disagreement regarding its visibility, support and linkage to career development. Managers tended to depict their role as enabling autonomy, while employees perceive a lack of structured support and recognition. Informal learning was found to be prevalent but extremely invisible in formal organizational processes. Originality/value: This study deepens understanding of the leadership of informal learning by highlighting the concept of "symbolic autonomy", where support for learning is rhetorically there without substantive mechanisms. It provides a theoretical contribution by positioning the relational and systemic aspects of informal learning leadership in the front line and offering practical understanding of how informal learning can be embedded more effectively within organizational practice.
Keywords:informal learning, knowledge work, leadership, self-directed learning, symbolic autonomy, organizational learning
Publication status:Published
Publication version:Version of Record
Publication date:10.09.2025
Numbering:Vol. 14, no. 2
PID:20.500.12556/ReVIS-12235 New window
ISSN:2232-5107
eISSN:2232-5697
DOI:https://doi.org/10.53615/10.53615/2232-5697.14.312-327 New window
Publication date in ReVIS:19.09.2025
Views:173
Downloads:6
Metadata:XML DC-XML DC-RDF
:
Copy citation
  
Share:Bookmark and Share


Hover the mouse pointer over a document title to show the abstract or click on the title to get all document metadata.

Record is a part of a journal

Title:International journal of management, knowledge and learning
Shortened title:IJMKL
Publisher:Mednarodna fakulteta za družbene in poslovne študije
ISSN:2232-5697
COBISS.SI-ID:259517440 New window

Licences

License:CC BY-SA 4.0, Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International
Link:http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/
Description:This Creative Commons license is very similar to the regular Attribution license, but requires the release of all derivative works under this same license.

Secondary language

Language:Slovenian
Title:Razhajajoče in zbližujoče se perspektive: raziskovanje vodenja neformalnega učenja v znanstvenem delu
Abstract:Namen: Študija preučuje, kako se izkušnje z neformalnim učenjem in njegovim upravljanjem razlikujejo in prekrivajo na različnih organizacijskih ravneh v znanju intenzivni organizaciji. Raziskava zapolnjuje vrzel v primerjalnih pogledih na vodenje neformalnega učenja s tem, da proučuje perspektive menedžerjev in zaposlenih.Oblika študije/metodologija/pristop:Raziskava je uporabila kvalitativni presečni načrt študije primera z 18 polstrukturiranimi intervjuji z menedžerji in zaposlenimi v mednarodni IT in svetovalni organizaciji. Analiza podatkov je bila izvedena z induktivno tematsko analizo, ki je omogočila izluščanje tem, povezanih z neformalnim učenjem, učnimi oblikami, vključenostjo vodij in organizacijskimi podporami.Ugotovitve:Rezultati kažejo soglasje med menedžerji in zaposlenimi, da je neformalnoučenje pomembno, a obstajajo pomembna nesoglasja glede njegove vidnosti, podpore in povezave z razvojem kariere. Menedžerji so svojo vlogo večinoma opisovali kot omogočanje avtonomije, medtem ko so zaposleni zaznavali pomanjkanje strukturirane podpore in priznanja. Ugotovljeno je bilo, da je neformalno učenje razširjeno, vendar v formalnih organizacijskih procesih izjemno nevidno.Izvirnost/vrednost:Raziskava poglablja razumevanje vodenja neformalnega učenja z osvetlitvijo koncepta »simbolične avtonomije«, kjer je podpora učenju retorično prisotna, vendar brez vsebinskih mehanizmov. Teoretično prispeva s postavitvijo relacijskih in sistemskih vidikov vodenja neformalnega učenja v ospredje ter nudi praktično razumevanje, kako je mogoče neformalno učenje učinkoviteje vključiti v organizacijsko prakso.


Back