Izpis gradiva

A+ | A- | | SLO | ENG

Naslov: Zdravljenje dvojne diagnoze v terapevtski skupnosti Sostro : diplomska naloga Avtorji: ID Leder, Živa (Avtor) ID Stepišnik Perdih, Tjaša (Mentor) Več o mentorju... Datoteke: RAZ_Leder_Ziva_i2020.pdf (1,19 MB) MD5: 3246B9CAC0EB9685E6EF967E80BC899B   Jezik: Slovenski jezik Vrsta gradiva: Diplomsko delo/naloga Tipologija: 2.11 - Diplomsko delo Organizacija: FUDS - Fakulteta za uporabne družbene študije Opis: V diplomski nalogi smo obravnavali koncept dvojne diagnoze (oziroma komorbidnosti) in zdravljenje le-te v terapevtski skupnosti Sostro Pelikan. Osebe, ki so komorbidne, imajo diagnosticirano hkratno duševno motnjo in zasvojenost. Diagnosticiranje komorbidnosti je težavno, zdravljenje pa je dolgotrajno in mora zajemati celostno obravnavo. V TS Sostro izvajajo integrativni pristop, ki združuje elemente zdravljenja zasvojenosti in duševne motnje hkrati. V empiričnem delu smo izvedli kvalitativno raziskavo, tj. polstrukturirane intervjuje z uporabniki terapevtske skupnosti, ki so bili v času raziskave vključeni v zdravljenje. Zanimalo nas je njihovo doživljanje življenja z dvojno diagnozo, njihova pot, ki jih je pripeljala na to točko, potek zdravljenja od vključitve v program do sedanjega trenutka in kakšen pomen ima njihova družina in podpora le-te na potek zdravljenja. Sodelovalo je osem oseb, dve ženskega in šest moškega spola, starih med 19 in 36 let. Glede na raziskave lahko na potek samega zdravljenja vpliva posameznikov razlog za vključitev v zdravljenje. Naša raziskava je pokazala, da sta se le dva od osmih v zdravljenje vključila sama, trije so se vključili zaradi zunanjih vplivov, a z zavedanjem, da to potrebujejo, trije pa so se vključili le zaradi zunanjih dejavnikov (starši, sodišče). Samo zdravljenje v TS Sostro je bilo ocenjeno pozitivno, večina udeležencev pa je našla pomanjkljivost v premajhnem prilaganju posamezniku. Vključitev družine v zdravljenje je glede na raziskave zelo pomembna in to je bilo potrjeno tudi s strani naših udeležencev. Vsi so potrdili, da jim družina predstavlja glavno motivacijsko sredstvo in podporo, hkrati pa cenijo delo, ki ga v procesu zdravljenja družinski člani opravijo tudi na sebi. Ključne besede: zasvojenost, duševne motnje, dvojna diagnoza, zdravljenje, TS Sostro Pelikan, diplomske naloge Kraj izida: Ljubljana Kraj izvedbe: Ljubljana Založnik: [Ž. Leder] Leto izida: 2020 Leto izvedbe: 2020 Št. strani: 47 str., [2] str. pril. PID: 20.500.12556/ReVIS-8123  UDK: 616.89 COBISS.SI-ID: 29518851  Datum objave v ReVIS: 13.08.2021 Število ogledov: 1495 Število prenosov: 109 Metapodatki:    Citiraj gradivo Navadno besedilo BibTeX EndNote XML EndNote/Refer RIS ABNT ACM Ref AMA APA Chicago 17th Author-Date Harvard IEEE ISO 690 MLA Vancouver : Kopiraj citat

Objavi na: Postavite miškin kazalec na naslov za izpis povzetka. Klik na naslov izpiše podrobnosti ali sproži prenos.

Sekundarni jezik

Jezik:

Angleški jezik

Opis:

In the thesis, we discuss the concept of dual diagnosis or, in other words, comorbidity, and its treatment at the therapeutic community Sostro Pelikan. Being diagnosed with comorbidity means that there is a concurrent presence of both a mental health disorder and substance abuse problem in the same person. The diagnosis itself is problematic, while the treatment is lengthy and has to be done in a comprehensive manner. Therapeutic community Sostro Pelikan employs an integrated approach which includes a concurrent treatment of addiction as well as all mental conditions. Empirical part of the thesis is based on a qualitative research, i. e. in-depth one-on-one interviews with all participants involved in the program at the time. We wanted to know how they are experiencing life with dual diagnosis, understand their journey that brought them to this point, learn about the progress of the treatment from the time they entered the program up to the present moment, and determine the significance of their families and their support in the course of the treatment. Eight individuals participated in the research, two females and six males, aging from 19 to 36 years. According to research, reasons for entering a treatment program can have an influence on its progress. Our study showed only two out of eight participants entered the program by their own volition, for three of them the main cause was an outside influence, albeit they were conscious of their need for treatment, and three entered only as a result of outside factors (parents, court orders). The treatment in TC Sostro was generally perceived in a positive manner, although a majority of participants found there was not enough adaptability in tailoring the program to individual’s needs. The importance of involving participants' families in the process has been stressed in many researches and it was also confirmed by our interviewees. They all acknowledged their family’s support as the main means of motivation; furthermore, they appreciate how members of their families work on self-improvement and personal growth throughout the treatment process.

Nazaj